End of Roe Vs Wade?

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
It's up to a woman if she wants a relationship with a man regardless of whether she's working or not

Of course it is. Never said otherwise.

However, if she chooses to work, then she should not be having sex with anyone other than her husband, or if she isn't married, then she shouldn't be having sex at all, because the natural result of sex is, you guessed it, A BABY!

and is hardly relevant to abortion.

It's relevant to whatever extent a woman is promiscuous.

There's lots of single woman parents for starters.

Single mothers should find a husband.

Promiscuous women should not murder their children.

It's truly as simple as that.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Of course it is. Never said otherwise.

However, if she chooses to work, then she should not be having sex with anyone other than her husband, or if she isn't married, then she shouldn't be having sex at all, because the natural result of sex is, you guessed it, A BABY!



It's relevant to whatever extent a woman is promiscuous.



Single mothers should find a husband.

Promiscuous women should not murder their children.

It's truly as simple as that.
Again, well aware of what you think men and women should do in regards to sex and marriage but it's ultimately up to each individual on that score. Single mothers aren't obliged to find a husband at all, nor should they be expected to. If they want one, fine, if they don't, also fine.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Murder of the innocent is condemned in the Bible, which calls the baby in the womb a child and affords him the same protection of "life for life" (among others) if a crime is committed that harms him while he is in the womb.

• A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25).

• The priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31).

 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
it's ultimately up to each individual on that score.

Wrong.

God said "Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh."

Who are you to say otherwise?

Single mothers aren't obliged to find a husband at all,

If they care about raising their children in the best possible environment, they should.

Most mothers these days hate their children, though, and it's partly their own fault.

nor should they be expected to.

Yes, they should.

If they want one, fine,

If they want children, they need to, if only for the sake of their child.

if they don't, also fine.

If they don't want a husband, then they shouldn't be having sex with anyone, which reduces unwanted pregnancies to zero, barring rape (which, in an ideal society, would be naturally deterred by putting rapists to death).
 

marke

Well-known member
Slavery is in the Bible.

Abortion isn't.
So? Early American group-think heathens supported and promoted slavery just like modern group-think savages promote evolution, abortion, and evolution, among other nonsense secular hedonism dogmas.
 

marke

Well-known member
• A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25).

• The priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31).

Imagine the heartbreaking horror of lefties to discover someone can be charged with murder for intentionally killing a fetus the mother did not want to be murdered.


FETAL HOMICIDE LAWS AND LEGAL PERSONHOOD: HOW THE CRIMINALIZATION OF FETAL DEATH INFRINGES ON WOMEN’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND BODILY AUTONOMY


Let us pause in a reflective moment of silence as we share the grief experienced by those who cannot believe how bad American has gotten with new unborn baby protection laws.



maxresdefault.jpg




 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
• A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only

Nope. The Bible says this:

“If men fight, and hurt a woman with child, so that she gives birth prematurely, yet no harm follows, he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman’s husband imposes on him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.But if any harm follows, then you shall give life for life,eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. - Exodus 21:22-25 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus21:22-25&version=NKJV

1) A crime is being committed, in which the pregnant woman is an innocent bystander.
2) If during the commission of that crime, the woman is caused to give birth prematurely:
a) If no harm follows (talking about the baby, not the woman), then the punishment is whatever the woman's husband imposes on the person who caused his wife to give birth prematurely, whatever the judge approves.
b) If as a result of the harm done, the baby is:
i. harmed in such a way that they become disfigured or permanently injured in some way, then the punishment shall be "eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe"
ii. harmed in such a way that the baby dies, then the punishment shall be "life for life."

(to her husband),

This isn't what is said.

suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25).

False, because it is inconsistent with the rest of the Bible, which calls the baby in the womb a child.


• The priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31).

This is a pitiful attempt to justify abortion, as it fails to recognize a few things:

 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber

The Bible says to visit those in prison, but does not advocate imprisonment as a punishment.

The Bible says to protect the borders, but welcome the stranger.

The Bible says to care for the sick, but do not steal.

The Bible says to not mistreat widows and orphans.

But the Bible also says, in no uncertain terms, that killing the innocent is a capital crime.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
This is why I'm asking if you condemn any form of contraception, I know where you stand with abortion obviously. Is it promiscuous to you if a monogamous married couple have regular sex
On what planet would this be promiscuity?
but use contraception as they either don't want kids or not until further down the line? The parameters for what you consider promiscuous behaviour would be helpful in context here.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Oh, so you're cool with an abortion exception for the life of the mother?

Thanks for clearing up that one.
I'm cool with ending any life which inherently threatens the life and limb of anybody else.

Like, ending the life of Vlad Putin, for example.

Clear enough?
 
Top