nikolai_42
Well-known member
Are there any promises of scripture that will (ultimately) be fulfilled outside of Christ?
Not outside of Christ but....outside of the church?
Are there any promises of scripture that will (ultimately) be fulfilled outside of Christ?
Are there any promises of scripture that will (ultimately) be fulfilled outside of Christ?
Are there any promises of scripture that will (ultimately) be fulfilled outside of Christ?
Yes, judgment.
i've never thought of scripture in those terms, i think of Jesus Christ with every scripture i read, however, there are may promises in scripture, even individuals. saying "ultimately" speaks of the future - end times and beyond ?
2Co 1:20 For all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us.
Even that is not without direct reference to Christ...
And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:
Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.
Acts 17:30-31
Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?
I Corinthians 6:1-2
Indeed, but it is. He that is without Him will be judged.
Judgment, as scriptuually defined to be unto 'damnation', doesn't belong to those IN Him.
Though indwelling was not yet possible, Peter demonstrated, by his denial of Jesus, He was not judged by Jesus. Peter judged himself before he took further steps away from Him and "when he returned, strengthened his brothers." In this we can say Peter was outside Jesus and when his error was revealed to him, repented and returned to his "place of safety IN Christ". I say "IN" because Peter's heart was knitted to the heart of Jesus by divine revelation. Being there was no indwelling as yet, Peter can be seen as a type of new born of God who backslided and to what degree he could have continued, depended upon him. Indwelling and Revelation is of God and I would imagine, from my own life, carries the same weight re conviction.
I don't really disagree since I know what you are getting at, but would point this out :
For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.
For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:
That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.
John 5:21-23
As I read that passage, I note that it actually fits the OP quite well. The fact is that all things are to be judged in the context of Christ. So all things (ultimately) will be found in and through Him. So even those that are not in Him will have their judgment obtained through Him because of what the Father has promised. Taken together with 2 Corinthians 1:20, this seems to imply very strongly that all eternal promises are only fulfilled in Christ (even if not all are in Christ). After all...
That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him:
...
And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church,
Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.
Ephesians 1:10,22-23
There was never any question about Peter's being in Christ - even if one could make the case that he wasn't really in Christ until as late as Pentecost.
Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.
And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God.
Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?
John 6:68-70
(Note Peter's important confession before Jesus said He had chosen them)
And after Peter protested that they needed to wash Jesus' feet...
I speak not of you all: I know whom I have chosen: but that the scripture may be fulfilled, He that eateth bread with me hath lifted up his heel against me.
Now I tell you before it come, that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe that I am he.
John 13:18-19
So...when Jesus prayed for Peter...
But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.
Luke 22:32
...it should be a stark contrast that Jesus doesn't say IF thou art converted....
So in the sense I understand to be "in Christ" (the promises, that is), Peter was always there.
I used Peter before John 20:22, when the indwelling of the Holy Spirit was administered by Jesus, only as a type by equating the truth given him by revelation by the knitting of his heart to Jesus, with the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, however, momentary the revelation.
If you are saying you used, I don't disagree. But I'm not quite sure I follow everything you said in that sentence.Peter as a type of man who is not "yet" in Christ
Yes. One who had understanding and embraced Jesus absent any indwelling.
Question: What do you believe anyone receives from being indwelt by the Holy Spirit?
I will answer the question, but simply in the interests of not going down rabbit trails and forgetting the original thought, please clarify what you meant in your statement. I imagine your answer will take off on mine, so I don't want to confuse the issue of my understanding and yours before clarifying what yours is.
Think on this: The flesh of man is purposed by God to come into union with Him. The Christian understands this. It is for this reason God allows him from time to time [on a daily basis . . ] to be left alone to be tested for him to find out his state of knowledge of the written word because that is what we are given to stand upon when temptations come. Jesus showed this to us by His own solitude in the wilderness.
.The Holy Spirit, in the most broad terms, provides conviction, revelation (understanding...the veil removed), boldness and power - and the fruit of the Spirit's work is clearly marked out by Paul.
1. The Fruit of the Spirit is not the Spirits work. It is the work and thus the mark of a Christian, without hypocracy. Bearing fruit is not an elective one chooses but, compulsory. The gifts of the Spirit are elective.
Think on this: The flesh of man is purposed by God to come into union with Him. The Christian understands this. It is for this reason God allows him from time to time [on a daily basis . . ] to be left alone to be tested for him to find out his state of knowledge of the written word because that is what we are given to stand upon when temptations come. Jesus showed this to us by His own solitude in the wilderness.
1. The Fruit of the Spirit is not the Spirits work. It is the work and thus the mark of a Christian, without hypocracy. Bearing fruit is not an elective one chooses but, compulsory. The gifts of the Spirit are elective.
I think you've made irreconcilable statements here. The flesh of man is not supposed to be in union with God. But it is to be crucified.
And resurrected in new of life in the here now __ now later. We who in Christ now, are of a new creation. How come you don't know that??
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
John 6:63
Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
Romans 8:7-8
The cross doesn't bring the flesh into union with God, it kills it.
The cross is a life style. I think what you need is to learn how to make disticntions beter than you do because what I read above speaks of you being all over the map. Paul is addressing the unbelieving, both in and out of Christ.
The fruit of the Spirit is not the Spirit's work?
No, it is not. It is our work, if you are Christian. Does the word OVERCOME ring any bells? How 'bout the parable of the "talents and the unfaithful servant"?
If bearing fruit is not elective, then how is the fruit of the Spirit any different? How is the fruit of the Spirit rather the fruit of the believer?
Simple: By living in Christ. When I live there I produce fruit FOR Him. His indwelling is for that exclusive purpose __ Christians producing fruit.
<again, better distinctions are needed>
I think you've made irreconcilable statements here. The flesh of man is not supposed to be in union with God. But it is to be crucified.
And resurrected in new of life in the here now __ now later. We who in Christ now, are of a new creation. How come you don't know that??
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
John 6:63
Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
Romans 8:7-8
The cross doesn't bring the flesh into union with God, it kills it.
The cross is a life style. I think what you need is to learn how to make disticntions beter than you do because what I read above speaks of you being all over the map. Paul is addressing the unbelieving, both in and out of Christ.
The fruit of the Spirit is not the Spirit's work? If bearing fruit is not elective, then how is the fruit of the Spirit any different? How is the fruit of the Spirit rather the fruit of the believer?
No, it is not. It is our work, if you are Christian. Does the word OVERCOME ring any bells? How 'bout the parable of the "talents and the unfaithful servant"?
If bearing fruit is not elective, then how is the fruit of the Spirit any different? How is the fruit of the Spirit rather the fruit of the believer?
Simple: By living in Christ. When I live there I produce fruit FOR Him. His indwelling is for that exclusive purpose __ Christians producing fruit.
<again, better distinctions are needed>
The fruit of the Spirit is only our work to display - not to create.