So do me a favor: Quote them, not me, when you insinuate advocacy of slavery.
For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud
- Thread starter Arthur Brain
- Start date
The government has no right to impede the free exercise of Christian worship, practice, and preaching. The government also has no right to establish Secular Humanism ideology as the only belief system allowed to be exercised in public.
Trump did not threaten to fire or jail Americans who did not agree with erroneous medical assumptions and mandates. Biden did that and for that, he is the fascist dictator, something Trump never was.
I did not say slavery but you are right to substitute the word "slavery" for the word "communism," whether advocated by barbarian democrats like Sanders and BLM Marxists, or savage jungle slavers.
They cannot regulate religious belief or treat people of different faiths in a biased fashion but they can regulate religious behavior if they do not target a religion and there is a has sound rationale and the restriction is applied across the board to all citizens. Use of peyote and the sacrifice of animals have been restricted by law for example.
They cannot regulate religious belief whatsoever. They have not done so for the most part. A law cannot show animus for religion or a recognized group like homosexuals.
If a cake maker refuses to endorse a sodomite wedding on religious grounds then the government is in serious violation of the separation of church and state to try to force the cake maker to abandon his religious convictions because they violate the doctrines of the state humanist religion.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
The baker is required to not deny them essentials like food and drink.
The baker is not required to decorate it.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Not even in the eyes of man.
The baker is not to have his constitutional religious rights violated by the non-constitutional prejudices and discrimination of the perverted sexual proclivities of sodomites.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Isn't that what I said?
I suspect so. I am not always good at correctly analyzing or understanding what people say. I'm blaming my experience and old age for the beats my mind skips.
On now you invoke the separation after denying it exists. Interesting. Pure opportunism with no-shame hypocrisy?
What a surprise. You are still a pack of bigots.
Last edited:
Secular US officials (democrats and assorted leftists) separate the free exercise of Christianity in public while openly endorsing Islam, Marxism, Socialism, Secular Humanism, and other atheistic based isms under the banner of democrat interpretations of separation of church and state.
You can be a sexual pervert if you like but you cannot be a benefit to society by promoting sodomy and perversion.
The court found that the law showed animus toward religion so they found it unconstitutional as written. The baker was willing to sell non-custom products to gay customers but not wedding cakes in particular.
I think the result is foolish. After all, the baker would not be forced to attend the wedding. I do not get why patrons even need to inform the baker who is getting married. Make the darn cake! Also, this should also mean by extension that gay business owners can refuse their services to particular church weddings. If this were the case, prepare for some ugly floral arrangements.
To be clear, all sodomy laws were declared unconstitutional. The government cannot enforce the preferences of a religious community for no good reason.
Also, wasn't the complaint about promiscuity in the gay community? Why hate on gay marriage? Committed relationships will cut down on what you hate most.
A human court or two has ruled against God? What idiots.
Atheists, Humanists, evolutionists, Marxists, and other assorted leftist rebels against God cannot understand why a Christian thinks his religious rights are superior to the rights of perverts to violate them.
God condemned sodomy and perversion. American judges and politicians overruled Him.
In his book Barr condemns the radical left in the media and the Obama administration, knowing they supported known lies to slander and spy on Trump for dirty democrat reasons.
Former AG Barr Writes Political Left Became Radicalized During Obama’s 2nd Term | Gregg Jarrett
Barr lambasts news media, accusing them of “corruption” and “active support for progressive ideology.”
Barr lambasts news media, accusing them of “corruption” and “active support for progressive ideology.” He writes the political left became radicalized during President Obama’s second term.
And you're a pile of homos.
Why would you brand an entire category of people over the comment of one?
Last edited: