“They will not do otherwise” is not the same thing as “they cannot do otherwise.”
That distinction matters.
they are going to sin they are not going to repent , prophesied in scripture .
either you believe it or you don't
but you can't change it
“they cannot do otherwise.”
Reposting the same Revelation passages does not strengthen your argument.
You have shown that Revelation says they did not repent.
No one denies that.
What you have not shown is that Revelation is prewritten history, or that their non-repentance was eternally fixed before they existed.
God wrote it past tense
why are you saying it has to be written before the foundation of the world "And they did not repent of their deeds."
2000 years before they existed not enough
Revelation says they did not repent. I accept that.
do you accept that they won't repent ?
But it does not say they were incapable of repenting. It does not say they had no genuine alternative. It does not say the future was exhaustively settled.
it says "And they did not repent of their deeds."
[21] And they did not repent of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts.
deeds , judgement and non-repentance past tense
appeal to silence
with that logic Jesus is not God because he did not say " I am God "
Neither.
My claim is that they have free will, and they will not repent.
so God's exhaustive infallible foreknowledge is no longer a problem.
A will is the ability to choose.
God's exhaustive infallible foreknowledge says they chose not to repent
So on my view, they could repent, but they will not, because they stubbornly refuse.
how in your view how could they repent when God says they did not repent ?
That places the blame for their sin and rebellion squarely on them.
same here , sin is still on them even tho God foreknew their sins
On your view, if their refusal was infallibly fixed beforehand, then they could not repent. Their non-repentance was necessary before they ever acted.
their sin and non-repentance
their sins, God's judgement their non-repentance is prophesied and
still their sins are their sins , not God's
all necessary
That removes responsibility from man, even if you do not explicitly place that responsibility on God.
So the question is not whether Revelation says they repent.
It says they do not.
The question is whether they could have repented.
So the question is whether Revelation is true and therefore necessary
their sins, God's judgement their non-repentance prophesied
If they could have repented, then the future was open, and their refusal is their own fault.
so God knows the will not repent
they can't do otherwise and yet it will still be their choice
"And they blasphemed the God of Heaven because of their pains and their sores. And they did not repent of their deeds."
If they could not have repented, then they were not free in any meaningful sense, and blaming them for what they could not avoid is unjust.
how could they repent if God knows they won't ?