Breathe
New member
This is what I'm talking about. I rest my case.
You have pushed a grieving woman to her limit. How cruel can you be?
This is what I'm talking about. I rest my case.
Why is this (old) new weasel allowed to slander me about the death of my child?
What happened to this place? Are members needed THAT badly?
You slander yourself, no needs to do that for you.
That's another lie, I did offer you proof and you said it wouldn't do any good because you had nothing to compare it to.
You have pushed a grieving woman to her limit. How cruel can you be?
Then maybe you should log off.Seems to me the drama here is getting too intense.
How many damn times are you all going to tell her to knock it off. I completely regret sharing my pain here altogether. Its not internet fodder for hatefilled psychos like her who pretend to be christian. People need to be able to feel safe with their hardest things when they share them. Its clear no one is safe here.
She attacks peoples families all the time.
Tell me if i buy a 500.00 membership like she did, can i cuss her out and offend her family, talk about her kids, laugh at any tradjedy she has, make this place look completely compassionless by allowing it - and harm whoever i please?
How many 0 warnings and knock it offs will there be, other people get banned off her for FAR less.
She is a *****, a hatefilled mean nasty witch.
So do i get the infraction now instead?
Go ahead and give me my infraction for my profanity. Where is it.
Punish me, while you let those hatefilled fake believers slander me and do nothing.
I earned it, they did too, but ill take mine, i dont have 500.00 to protect me like Eeset.
Please stop self-aggrandizing!
It is highly unlikely that anyone on this forum takes you seriously enough to hate you!
You are a silly, opinionated , self-inflating demagogue.
And that's okay!
Seems to me the drama here is getting too intense.
Oh, please. another one of those speeches.
If people don't take me seriously why do I have so many red bars?
goodness. Your logic is so holey.
A4T, I know that you're mad about this. But, I just got home and saw the huge fight going on. I'm hoping that my warning to the three main instigators works. If it doesn't, I will give them all three infractions.
I'm not giving you an infraction. You're mad about what they are saying and I don't blame you at all.
If I had been home, this would have been stopped earlier today. I'm sorry.
I'm not protecting Eeset. I usually give a warning to anyone before I hand out infractions (with a few exceptions). I would warn you before giving you one, as well.
Yes, Eeset has been protected, she was told the last time over and over when she started about my son, to stop or she would get one.
Shes doing it again and again, and keeps being"warned"
By what stretch of the imagination is it even acceptable EVER much less time after time?
And where the hell does this fake new face get off outright slandering me?
It doesn't come down to that. I believe her. I've given you benefit of the doubt and suggested that you should choose a high road that would cost you what? It isn't as though you have any long standing relations or grudges at this point, right?You already know what my point is although we both know who's favor you're leaning toward here.
Except it isn't and I only just told you why. People return all the time, some to make trouble, some for a new start, some to skirt bans. And few of them own up to it at first. AB was red77, a friend of mine old and new, to note a good one. Resurrected was some other dude and before that koban. There's a fellow who returns angrily from time to time who has had several usernames, and so on.It's crazy and bizarre to accuse someone of being someone else
All anyone has to go by is the style of writing. Some people have fairly distinctive prose and particular views. Those don't tend to change. That said, it happens that people can simply look like other people, write like and/or hold similarly strong opinions.and to the extent she did me without proof.
If she didn't like the person she thought you were that would figure. You think you know her now, in very short order. How would you describe inferring that someone who so far as you objectively know lost her child might be making it up and using it for leverage? Hateful?She was hateful, accusatory and actually blaming me for things this other person did.
Every behavior needs context. And I think Angel is strongly emotional as a person, a particular heightened by her circumstance and I couldn't begin to speculate what having someone call that sort of pain into public question would do to even the most serene of personalities else. None of us is purely rational, given the right confluence of circumstances.Now I ask you...is that normal, rational behavior?
Yes, Eeset has been protected, she was told the last time over and over when she started about my son, to stop or she would get one.
Shes doing it again and again, and keeps being"warned"
By what stretch of the imagination is it even acceptable EVER much less time after time?
I almost cannot believe what I just read.
Never...not for one millisecond, have I doubted A4T. I've chatted with her in PM about her son and I can tell you...this is a woman who is genuinely grieving.
As far as I'm concerned, this subject should be off limits under penalty of immediate banning. It has simply gone on for too long and gone way beyond anything appropriate.
Does my post say it was edited? No. Does one editing their posts cause the same edit to apply to any quotes of said post that were made before the edit? No. So, what, exactly, is your accusation?Oh, must have just conveniently disappeared then...lain:
And you make that wager based on what?Oh, out in the public forum for sure but that's not what I meant. I wager you get different rep privileges while doing so in the 'private' club however.
Sometimes threads act up because of bandwidth issues. That happens when you spam.Oh, it told enough...
It's a thread about rep? And up to part IV no less?![]()
Then enlighten us.C'mon LH. People aren't stupid. It's pretty obvious what it's "about"...
So do I.I almost cannot believe what I just read.
Never...not for one millisecond, have I doubted A4T. I've chatted with her in PM about her son and I can tell you...this is a woman who is genuinely grieving.
As far as I'm concerned, this subject should be off limits under penalty of immediate banning. It has simply gone on for too long and gone way beyond anything appropriate.
I agree!
I almost cannot believe what I just read.
Never...not for one millisecond, have I doubted A4T. I've chatted with her in PM about her son and I can tell you...this is a woman who is genuinely grieving.
As far as I'm concerned, this subject should be off limits under penalty of immediate banning. It has simply gone on for too long and gone way beyond anything appropriate.
I almost cannot believe what I just read.
Never...not for one millisecond, have I doubted A4T. I've chatted with her in PM about her son and I can tell you...this is a woman who is genuinely grieving.
As far as I'm concerned, this subject should be off limits under penalty of immediate banning. It has simply gone on for too long and gone way beyond anything appropriate.
Does my post say it was edited? No. Does one editing their posts cause the same edit to apply to any quotes of said post that were made before the edit? No. So, what, exactly, is your accusation?
And you make that wager based on what?
Sometimes threads act up because of bandwidth issues. That happens when you spam.