elohiym
Well-known member
Traditio said:OkDoser has repeatedly brought up the Swarthmore case. I have yet to see anyone other than myself address it. I myself am still waiting to hear people like AnnaBenedetti, Rusha, etc. directly address it.
In my view, it simply wasn't a rape.
She was raped. See below. Your view is poorly informed and you should have researched the matter before concluding that a woman wasn't raped based on a discredited article.
Exclusive: The Sexual Assault Survivor George Will Dismissed Responds
While the Philadelphia magazine story clearly documented a serious example of sexual assault (notably, Sendrow specifically stated that she did not consent), Sendrow felt that the magazine took her story and others out of context and omitted key details, "which was exactly what we didn't want to happen." Her assault was "more violent than what [the Philadelphia magazine reporter] wrote. The way he made it seem was very small in comparison." Sendrow added that she received "very threatening" messages from her attacker days after the assault, which the Philadelphia story hadn't included. She had hoped that talking to the media would in part help other survivors by showing they no longer had to be afraid and that their stories couldn't be diminished, and was frustrated when that was "exactly what [Will's column] did."
She also spoke on television about the trivialization of her rape:
Sexual assault survivor slams George Will column | |
What is your argument that she was not raped?