THE DEATH SONGS OF DAVID BOWIE.

[zoo22]

Still no attempt to explain what in the video is "sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening."

Just more of aCW bumbling on about homosexuals. Is anyone surprised?

It's a 10 minute video. You people can't even muster up the brainpower to explain what it is that makes it "sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening"?

 

[User Name]

Just more of aCW bumbling on about homosexuals. Is anyone surprised?

One must wonder what the cause of that particular obsession is.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

So dopery is fine in your book, just so long as the doper isn't gay?

David Bowie, due to his cross dressing homosexual-drug filled lifestyle, brought misery to many a human being and helped destroy many of our societies invaluable institutions.

If you would like to come and discuss the life he lived and the agenda that he promoted, here is the thread to do it in.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=112309

 

[User Name]

David Bowie, due to his cross dressing homosexual-drug filled lifestyle, brought misery to many a human being and helped destroy many of our societies invaluable institutions.

Personally, I think you're hiding something of your own. The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Still no attempt to explain what in the video is "sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening."

That was done in an earlier post by me. Wait, you don't have me on ignore do you?

Just more of aCW bumbling on about homosexuals. Is anyone surprised?

If David Bowie had been an NFL lineman and not a cross dressing homosexual musician, it's likely that the topic of homosexuality wouldn't have come up.

It's a 10 minute video. You people can't even muster up the brainpower to explain what it is that makes it "sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening"?

Come on zoo, tell the other people here why you HATE God so much.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

What a surprise, no answer whatsoever to what's "sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening" in the video. Not even an attempt.

aCW's just thrashing around, spewing more of his his ongoing "hordes of homosexuals" fantasies. It's embarrassing.

Anyone want to take some bets on whether or not any of the Holy Rollers here will be able to answer what should be a simple explanation to the claim:

What is it that's "sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening" in the video?

And "pornographic"? What in the world do you find "pornographic" about the video? Some scarecrows? Seriously? What kind of weird things do you people fabricate in your minds?

Although you seem perplexed by the word "pornography" used in
my OP, you happened to focus in on the exact part of the video
I was talking about? It seems that you thought it was pornographic
as well or you wouldn't have zeroed in on it. You gave yourself away
partner.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Anyway, this has gotten off track. I'm interested to hear an explanation of what in Bowie's Blackstar video is "sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening."

So far, not a peep.

Peep! Now there's one. Satisfied?

 

[zoo22]

Although you seem perplexed by the word "pornography" used in
my OP, you happened to focus in on the exact part of the video
I was talking about? It seems that you thought it was pornographic
as well or you wouldn't have zeroed in on it. You gave yourself away
partner.

What? You'd said:

The Crucifixion scene could be seen as pornographic.

There's only one part of the video that could in any way be construed as a "crucifixion" scene: the scarecrows.

Right? You'd told us the scene you were talking about.

I assure you, I don't find scary scarecrows "pornographic."

Anyway. Are you putting together your explanation of what it is in the video that you find "sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening"?

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Hey Zoo, are you really shocked by all the Bible thumping (as you call it)
going on in a Christian forum? Seems to me it fits in perfectly. If you don't
like it, find a nice pagan, atheist/agnostic, satanic forum, where you'll be
more comfortable?

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

You'd said:



There's only one part of the video that could in any way be construed as a "crucifixion" scene: the scarecrows.

You're embarrassing.

Anyway. Are you putting together your explanation of what it is in the video that you find "sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening"?

You're right about that scene. I did say that. I fess up to it. So far as
the other words I used, Christians will understand what I mean by
using those particular words. You're not a Christian, so why would
I bother explaining to you, why I felt the way I did?

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Now, you're embarrassing yourself Zoo.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

I owe you no explanation. Not necessary, nor productive. Sinful people
love sinful things. Get it?

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Looks like Christianity makes you feel uneasy Zoo? Why not, pack
your bags, get outta Dodge and head for the hills?

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Bowie was into Satanism and was intrigued by Alistair Crowley. Known
as the most evil man at one time. He was also a Satanist/occultist.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

I can see why you don't feel right around a bunch of Christians, Zoo. You're
in the minority. You're a lost soul headed for judgement and the Lake of Fire.
I'd be nervous about that to.

 

[zoo22]

Anyway, this has gotten off track. I'm interested to hear an explanation of what in Bowie's Blackstar video is "sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening."

I owe you no explanation. Not necessary, nor productive. Sinful people
love sinful things. Get it?

I'll take that as a "no, I can't back up what I'm saying."

Why in the world wouldn't you want to explain what it is you find ""sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening" about this video? Besides that you don't know what you're talking about. I mean, if you can explain it, please do, and prove me wrong. But I really don't believe that you can.

It's like a celebration of ignorance here sometimes.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

I became interested in Christianity, out of fear. I was twelve years old
in 1962 and went to my Mom and asked her if we were gonna go to Hell?
She answered; "Probably!"

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

I'll take that as a "no, I can't back up what I'm saying."

Why in the world wouldn't you want to explain what it is you find ""sacrilegious, blasphemous, disturbing, anti-Christian, and sickening" about this video? Besides that you don't know what you're talking about. I mean, if you can explain it, please do, and prove me wrong.

It's like a celebration of ignorance here sometimes.

You, being an unbeliever, just wouldn't receive my explanation
and accept it well. An unbeliever is different than a true believer.
You don't have the ability to see things through a Christian
perspective. You're Spiritually handicapped.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Perhaps, this isn't a thread that's interesting enough for you?

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

True Christians are more sensitive to blasphemy, satanism, witchcraft and evil.