Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 6

aCultureWarrior

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Let me use this as one example of why I blame mostly democrats as well as some 'democrat-lite' republicans for the promotion of sexual depravity in America. I will admit that whether democrat or republican, anyone who promotes sexual depravity is of the devil. Period.

House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights
By MATTHEW DALY
May 17, 2019
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.
The vote was 236-173, with every Democrat voting in favor, along with eight Republicans. Cheers and applause broke out on the House floor as the bill crossed the threshold for passage.
As shown numerous times (the last time being a couple of posts ago) with the SCOTUS 'Bostock v Clayton Co. GA' "homosexual/transgender civil rights" ruling, Trump SCOTUS Justices Neil Gorsuch, who wrote the majority opinion, and Brett Kavanaugh who congratulated homosexuals and transgenders on their 'victory', beat the House to it.

BTW, would you like to see the vote on confirming rainbow flag wavers Gorsuch and Kavanaugh by Republicans? It was 100% approval.

Now that I've shot that example down, would you like to present more?
 
Last edited:

marke

Well-known member
As shown numerous times (the last time being a couple of posts ago) with the SCOTUS 'Bostock v Clayton Co. GA' "homosexual/transgender civil rights" ruling, Trump SCOTUS Justices Neil Gorsuch, who wrote the majority opinion, and Brett Kavanaugh who congratulated homosexuals and transgenders on their 'victory', beat the House to it.

BTW, would you like to see the vote on confirming rainbow flag wavers Gorsuch and Kavanaugh by Republicans? It was 100% approval.

Now that I've shot that example down, would you like to present more?
I oppose all forms of sodomy advocacy, whether from democrats, from republicans, from judges, from lawyers, from college professors, from religious workers, or from anyone else. If you elect democrats you can count on their support and advocacy of Sodomy. If Republicans are in charge there is hope that sodomy can be dealt with in a manner consistent with God's views on the perverted sin.
 

aCultureWarrior

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
I oppose all forms of sodomy advocacy, whether from democrats, from republicans, from judges, from lawyers, from college professors, from religious workers, or from anyone else.
That was so good that it's worthy of a double self pat on the back.

Nonverbal_Praise_Pat_on_back.gif




If you elect democrats you can count on their support and advocacy of Sodomy. If Republicans are in charge there is hope that sodomy can be dealt with in a manner consistent with God's views on the perverted sin.

Since rainbow flag waving libertarians have taken over the once traditional family values Party, the only "hope" is that they and Donald Trump are chased back to the Libertarian Party where they should have stayed in the first place and true conservatives rule the Republican Party.
 

marke

Well-known member
That was so good that it's worthy of a double self pat on the back.

Nonverbal_Praise_Pat_on_back.gif






Since rainbow flag waving libertarians have taken over the once traditional family values Party, the only "hope" is that they and Donald Trump are chased back to the Libertarian Party where they should have stayed in the first place and true conservatives rule the Republican Party.
Unsaved barbarians can run around like headless chickens to one political party or another, but faithful Christians will never deny that God condemns sodomy.
 

aCultureWarrior

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Unsaved barbarians can run around like headless chickens to one political party or another, but faithful Christians will never deny that God condemns sodomy.
How about when the one political party that those "unsaved barbarians" embraced because it stood for traditional family values no longer does and in fact proudly supports the God-hating, child molesting/indoctrinating, institution destroying LGBT agenda and even elects a rainbow flag waver as President, is it ok for them to leave that Party then?

According to the Bible, if you continue to support that Party, you're committing either a sin of omission, a sin of commission or both.
Which one are you guilty of for voting for rainbow flag waver Donald Trump "marke", or are you guilty of both?

Question: "What is a sin of commission?"

Answer:
There are two basic ways we sin: either by omission or commission. Sins of omission are those in which we knew we should have done something good, but refused (James 4:17). A sin of commission is a sin we take action to commit, whether in thought, word, or deed. A sin of commission can be intentional or unintentional.
https://www.gotquestions.org/sin-of-commission.html

Question: "What is a sin of omission?"

Answer:
James 4:17 declares, "Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins." A sin of omission is a sin that is the result of not doing something God’s Word teaches that we should do. It is generally used in contrast with the corresponding phrase “the sin of commission,” or sins that a person actively commits
https://www.gotquestions.org/sin-of-omission.html
 

marke

Well-known member
How about when the one political party that those "unsaved barbarians" embraced because it stood for traditional family values no longer does and in fact proudly supports the God-hating, child molesting/indoctrinating, institution destroying LGBT agenda and even elects a rainbow flag waver as President, is it ok for them to leave that Party then?

According to the Bible, if you continue to support that Party, you're committing either a sin of omission, a sin of commission or both.
Which one are you guilty of for voting for rainbow flag waver Donald Trump "marke", or are you guilty of both?

Question: "What is a sin of commission?"

Answer:
There are two basic ways we sin: either by omission or commission. Sins of omission are those in which we knew we should have done something good, but refused (James 4:17). A sin of commission is a sin we take action to commit, whether in thought, word, or deed. A sin of commission can be intentional or unintentional.
https://www.gotquestions.org/sin-of-commission.html

Question: "What is a sin of omission?"

Answer:
James 4:17 declares, "Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins." A sin of omission is a sin that is the result of not doing something God’s Word teaches that we should do. It is generally used in contrast with the corresponding phrase “the sin of commission,” or sins that a person actively commits
https://www.gotquestions.org/sin-of-omission.html
I bear no allegiance to the republican party but I will support candidates of the republican party as long as they prove themselves more favorable to God's laws and principles than do non-republican candidates.
 

aCultureWarrior

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
I bear no allegiance to the republican party but I will support candidates of the republican party as long as they prove themselves more favorable to God's laws and principles than do non-republican candidates.
So you found rainbow flag waver Donald Trump "more favorable to God's laws".
What is it about that rainbow flag of perversion and death that Donald Trump is proudly holding in my avatar that makes it so "favorable to God's laws"?

Since you didn't answer my question about whether you committed sins of omission or sins of commission when you voted for a homosexual/transgender activist (twice), I'll answer for you:

Sins of commission: You actively committed a sin by voting for a God-hating, child molesting/indoctrinating, institution destroying homosexual activist for President (twice).

It's ok though, with cheap grace theology being a popular movement these days, people can still embrace the rainbow flag and be forgiven by God, as long as they say the right words (Romans 10:9)
 

aCultureWarrior

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
I had more interaction with conservative columnist Selwyn Duke in another forum. Before I share Duke's and Mission: America's Linda Harvey's columns that talk about the GOP and ignoring the LGBT child molestation/indoctrinating that is going on, I'll share what I wrote to Selwyn about Donald Trump and those who sold out God for their '30 pieces of silver'.

"Thank you for your response Selwyn, it's good to hear from the author of great articles like "Why Many American Christians are un-Christian" and "When Hypocrisy is a Good Thing" once again.

Before I explain my "welcome back" comment in detail, let me share a quote from a brilliant writer:

"There are many doctrinal differences among the denominations, and good people could debate them ad nauseam and still not settle every one. Yet, if anything is central to Christianity, it’s the belief that Truth is spelled with a capital “T,” that it is absolute, universal and eternal. And also central is a corollary of this belief: that there is an absolute, universal and eternal answer to every moral question; that right and wrong are not a matter of opinion, that they don’t change from time to time and place to place."

I owe gratitude to many conservative columnists, religious leaders/celebrities and politicians who shared the truth about Donald Trump back in 2016 with their articles and words showing that Donald Trump has a long history of homosexual/transgender activism (actually many on the left also shared that, obviously hoping it would dissuade true conservatives/Christians from voting for Trump). With that information, I put great effort into sharing it with others hoping they'd join me in voting for God-fearing men as God instructs mankind to do in Exodus 18:21.

Due to the heavy libertarian influence in the Republican Party, Donald Trump received the nomination and all of those who were once vocal of Donald Trump's liberalism/libertarianism went silent. After being banned in numerous "conservative" forums for speaking the truth about Donald Trump's long history of homosexual/transgender activism, which carried into his Presidency, it was obvious to me that those once conservative columnists, religious leaders/celebrities and politicians who only months before spoke the truth about Donald Trump, were told by the GOP Establishment that if they didn't jump on the rainbow colored Trump Train, then they could kiss their lucrative syndicated columns and whatever financial support they got from Republicans, goodbye.
Yes Selwyn, they sold out God (and hence conservatism) for their '30 pieces of silver'.

My thanks to you and Mission: America's Linda Harvey for writing such an important article (Harvey's "12 Ways Homosexual Adults Endanger Children" is a classic), and I look forward to many more like it in the future.

God bless."

duke.jpg

Selwyn Duke
 

marke

Well-known member
So you found rainbow flag waver Donald Trump "more favorable to God's laws".
What is it about that rainbow flag of perversion and death that Donald Trump is proudly holding in my avatar that makes it so "favorable to God's laws"?
Darn straight I favored Donald Trump over leftist socialist sexual perversion-promoting Hillary Clinton.
 

marke

Well-known member
It's ok though, with cheap grace theology being a popular movement these days, people can still embrace the rainbow flag and be forgiven by God, as long as they say the right words (Romans 10:9)
You are attempting the impossible by trying to paint Hillary Clinton as a Bible-honoring Christian conservative as opposed to a flag-waving Donald Trump. Hillary supports and promotes sodomy. She does not oppose Sodomy.
 

aCultureWarrior

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
You are attempting the impossible by trying to paint Hillary Clinton as a Bible-honoring Christian conservative as opposed to a flag-waving Donald Trump. Hillary supports and promotes sodomy. She does not oppose Sodomy.
Give up your con game, it didn't work in the first 5 threads and it's not working now.

Back soon with Linda Harvey and Selwyn Duke's articles exposing the GOP ( and hence Donald Trump) for ignoring the destruction that Trump's rainbow flag of perversion and death brings to children.
 

aCultureWarrior

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
aCultureWarrior said:


So you found rainbow flag waver Donald Trump "more favorable to God's laws".
What is it about that rainbow flag of perversion and death that Donald Trump is proudly holding in my avatar that makes it so "favorable to God's laws"?

Darn straight I favored Donald Trump over leftist socialist sexual perversion-promoting Hillary Clinton.

Since you did bring up the word "socialist", and I have shown throughout the past two threads how Donald Trump is one, I suppose when I get the time we should revisit a topic that I covered in an earlier thread that was called:

"The high cost of sodomy".

While I don't believe that thread is available for viewing, there is a link that I'll share not only showing the high cost of homosexuality morally, but economically as well.

I'm not sure why libertarians who want liberal social 'values' legalized nor people who claim that they just don't care about people engaging in sexual perversion would think that a nation can have sexual anarchy and a sound economic system at the same time.

Perhaps you can explain that theory and if not, have your buddy Right Divider take a shot at it.
 

marke

Well-known member
Give up your con game, it didn't work in the first 5 threads and it's not working now.

Back soon with Linda Harvey and Selwyn Duke's articles exposing the GOP ( and hence Donald Trump) for ignoring the destruction that Trump's rainbow flag of perversion and death brings to children.
Let's assume for a mi
aCultureWarrior said:


So you found rainbow flag waver Donald Trump "more favorable to God's laws".
What is it about that rainbow flag of perversion and death that Donald Trump is proudly holding in my avatar that makes it so "favorable to God's laws"?



Since you did bring up the word "socialist", and I have shown throughout the past two threads how Donald Trump is one, I suppose when I get the time we should revisit a topic that I covered in an earlier thread that was called:

"The high cost of sodomy".

While I don't believe that thread is available for viewing, there is a link that I'll share not only showing the high cost of homosexuality morally, but economically as well.

I'm not sure why libertarians who want liberal social 'values' legalized nor people who claim that they just don't care about people engaging in sexual perversion would think that a nation can have sexual anarchy and a sound economic system at the same time.

Perhaps you can explain that theory and if not, have your buddy Right Divider take a shot at it.
You seem intent on dividing Americans into political groups with strictly defined boundaries. That is not me. I am a Christian conservative bounded strictly by Biblical revelation.
 

aCultureWarrior

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Let's assume for a mi

You seem intent on dividing Americans into political groups with strictly defined boundaries. That is not me. I am a Christian conservative bounded strictly by Biblical revelation.
By voting for rainbow flag waver Donald Trump (twice) what exactly are you "conserving"?
 

aCultureWarrior

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
While I haven't wandered into the depths of Sodom and Gomorrah (i.e. LGBT forums) to see what kind words they had for Dr. Judith Reisman when they learned of her passing, there were a couple of comments at a libertarian leaning forum that I frequent.

Some guy that goes by the name of Bob...wrote:

Reisman exposed nothing. She was a conspiricy theorist and had an ax to grind.

My reply was: It took the rainbow flag wavers a day to come out and spit on Dr. Reisman's grave, but better late than never, right "Bob"?

Reisman's campaign against Kinsey was described by Morton Hunt (1999) as follows: "To use smear tactics, methods of intimidation, and political trickery to achieve what one considers a moral end, is to live by the principle that the end justifies the means.

My reply: I have no idea who Morton Hunt is, but I suspect that he became sexually aroused when he read about Kinsey's "scientific experiments" where little babies were held down and "sexually stimulated" while these "researchers" documented (over the SCREAMS of those babies) how many times they achieved orgasm.
"Bob", in some circles they call that p*dophllia, in yours don't they call that "adult-child/infant love"?

Come on TOL'ers, let that hatred that you've had for Dr. Judith Reisman out, as her body isn't even cold yet and what a better time than now to spit on her grave?
 

marke

Well-known member
While I haven't wandered into the depths of Sodom and Gomorrah (i.e. LGBT forums) to see what kind words they had for Dr. Judith Reisman when they learned of her passing, there were a couple of comments at a libertarian leaning forum that I frequent.

Some guy that goes by the name of Bob...wrote:

Reisman exposed nothing. She was a conspiricy theorist and had an ax to grind.

My reply was: It took the rainbow flag wavers a day to come out and spit on Dr. Reisman's grave, but better late than never, right "Bob"?

Reisman's campaign against Kinsey was described by Morton Hunt (1999) as follows: "To use smear tactics, methods of intimidation, and political trickery to achieve what one considers a moral end, is to live by the principle that the end justifies the means.

My reply: I have no idea who Morton Hunt is, but I suspect that he became sexually aroused when he read about Kinsey's "scientific experiments" where little babies were held down and "sexually stimulated" while these "researchers" documented (over the SCREAMS of those babies) how many times they achieved orgasm.
"Bob", in some circles they call that p*dophllia, in yours don't they call that "adult-child/infant love"?

Come on TOL'ers, let that hatred that you've had for Dr. Judith Reisman out, as her body isn't even cold yet and what a better time than now to spit on her grave?
I tend to believe Reisman must have been OK since the black racist SPLC condemned her work. I never read anything she wrote and never heard of her until this came up here.
 

aCultureWarrior

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
I tend to believe Reisman must have been OK since the black racist SPLC condemned her work. I never read anything she wrote and never heard of her until this came up here.
Being that you're so enamored with Donald Trump and the new rainbow flag waving Republican Party, I doubt that Dr. Reisman's name came up unless it was placing her face on a dartboard.

I remember a libertarian TOL'er who called himself "Barbarian" belittling Reisman because she was a song writer for Captain Kangaroo. Boy, a woman that writes songs that makes children smile and laugh, now that's pure evil.
 

marke

Well-known member
Being that you're so enamored with Donald Trump and the new rainbow flag waving Republican Party, I doubt that Dr. Reisman's name came up unless it was placing her face on a dartboard.

I remember a libertarian TOL'er who called himself "Barbarian" belittling Reisman because she was a song writer for Captain Kangaroo. Boy, a woman that writes songs that makes children smile and laugh, now that's pure evil.
I have never expressed undue appreciation for Trump or the Republican Party and have never even heard of Reisman before you mentioned her. Your bias is causing you to make false allegations you should be ashamed of.
 
Top