Young Earth or Old?

[7djengo7]

I provided a reference to the USGS site.

Obviously you deem the site worthless for the purpose of furnishing an answer to the question @JudgeRightly asked you. If you had an answer, you'd answer. The fact that you don't answer shows you have no answer to give, and the fact that you have no answer to give shows you did not get an answer to the question @JudgeRightly asked you from the site to which you're linking. The fact that you did not get an answer to @JudgeRightly's question from the site to which you're linking shows that (if you've even visited the site to which you're linking) you do not deem anything provided by the site to be an answer to @JudgeRightly's question.

So you can explain how plates of rock that are 10-60 miles thick can "subduct"?

@Avajs: <NO ANSWER>

@Avajs' not answering that question is an admission that he doesn't think the site to which he has linked can explain how plates of rock 10-60 miles thick can "subduct".

If so, please provide, at a minimum, even a conceptual model for how it would happen?

@Avajs: <NO ANSWER>

@Avajs's silence toward @JudgeRightly's request is @Avajs' admission that even he, himself, doesn't believe that the site to which he has linked furnishes anything like what @JudgeRightly has requested him to provide.

 

[7djengo7]

The USGS site provides information.

Does it provide you with an answer to the question @JudgeRightly asked you? Yes or No?

So you can explain how plates of rock that are 10-60 miles thick can "subduct"?

If so, please provide, at a minimum, even a conceptual model for how it would happen?

So far, your failure to answer the question asked you by @JudgeRightly -- your loud silence toward it -- is the equivalent of you providing a NO in answer the question, "Does it provide you with an answer to the question @JudgeRightly asked you? Yes or No?"

In other words, whatever "information" you think "the USGS site provides", you do not think "the USGS site provides" an answer to the question you have been asked by @JudgeRightly.

 

[7djengo7]

I'm taking a lot of science on faith if you wish to put it that way---but in every case it is faith based on evidence.

Have some courage to look at evidence.

On what "evidence" is your faith based that what you choose to call "evidence" is evidence?

@Avajs: <NO ANSWER>