The long nightmare has ended. Trump leaves the White House

[eider]

:vomit:

So you're actually defending pedophilia, now?

Intentionally touching a young girl's chest in a public setting is inappropriate, at best, and pedophilic at worst.

Even worse if it's done in such a way as to try to make it seem accidental or coincidental.

Not all Christians see the holding of an infant like you do.
This is a picture posted by thechurchofjesuschrist.org

Did any of you ever have children? Did you ever change a nappy? Did you ever cuddle a child? No?
Or was it OK to beat them?

'Suffer the little children to come unto me......'

 

[JudgeRightly]

No, in no way whatsoever as should have been blatantly apparent already. Not interested.

Arthur Brain, do you, here and now, condemn touching children in inappropriate places, let alone on camera?

This is a simply yes or no question. Anything other than a resounding YES I CONDEMN IT will be a "NO, I do not condemn it."

 

[JudgeRightly]

Not all Christians see the holding of an infant like you do.
This is a picture posted by thechurchofjesuschrist.org

Did any of you ever have children? Did you ever change a nappy? Did you ever cuddle a child? No?
Or was it OK to beat them?

'Suffer the little children to come unto me......'
View attachment 370

Eider, do you, here and now, condemn touching children in inappropriate places?

This is a simple yes or no question. Anything other than a resounding YES I CONDEMN IT will be a "NO, I do not condemn it."

 

[eider]

Eider, do you, here and now, condemn touching children in inappropriate places?

This is a simple yes or no question. Anything other than a resounding YES I CONDEMN IT will be a "NO, I do not condemn it."

Not if I was changing a nappy, or treating an infection. No!

If you did not give allowance for innocent actions then your question was not simple.

Are you a father?

 

[Stripe]

So much for your idea of Unity.
So long as all the World agrees with Strip there will be Unity.

Otherwise Stripe will brand other minds in the World as evil.

Wonderful Unity.

You're too stupid to talk to any more.

 

[eider]

You're too stupid to talk to any more.

Thank goodness for that!

Don't post to me again.

 

[expos4ever]

What you're really arguing is that the more common a sin becomes the more acceptable it is and the less harmful it is.

Nonsense - I am saying nothing of the kind.

This nut (leatherneck) is suggesting that a video showing a distracted old man's hand casually grazing the chest area of a young girls constitutes pedophilia.

That, my friend, is the very definition of knee-to-the-groin stupidity.

 

[eider]

Jesus holding little girls.................

There it is...... What we do innocently is innocent. How other people view our innocent actions can be very wicked. It's all in the mind, I think.

 

[Leatherneck]

Nonsense - I am saying nothing of the kind.

This nut (leatherneck) is suggesting that a video showing a distracted old man's hand casually grazing the chest area of a young girls constitutes pedophilia.

That, my friend, is the very definition of knee-to-the-groin stupidity.

Thank you for considering me a nut. If I were to be in agreement with your chosen perversion and spiritual blindness I would ask God’s forgiveness.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Arthur Brain, do you, here and now, condemn touching children in inappropriate places, let alone on camera?

This is a simply yes or no question. Anything other than a resounding YES I CONDEMN IT will be a "NO, I do not condemn it."

See Expos4ever and Eider's responses on the score as they answer you resoundingly.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Not if I was changing a nappy, or treating an infection. No!

If you did not give allowance for innocent actions then your question was not simple.

Are you a father?

In black and white world it has to be simple even though in real life it isn't.

 

[Rusha]

In black and white world it has to be simple even though in real life it isn't.

It’s about projecting trump’s sexual immorality on to the family man who beat hm in the election. The same thing happened with Roy Moore (trump’s candidate) ...

 

[JudgeRightly]

Not if I was changing a nappy, or treating an infection. No!

If you did not give allowance for innocent actions then your question was not simple.

Are you a father?

Why can't you just say, "YES, I condemn touching children in inappropriate places, with the exception of changing diapers, treating infections, etc"?

Perhaps it's my fault for oversimplifying the question in order to cover the widest range of possibilities with regards to pedophilia.

Allow me to ask again (to both you and @Arthur Brain).

Do you condemn touching children in inappropriate places, barring medical treatment, basic hygiene, and any reason that is non-sexual by nature?

Yes or no.

 

[Leatherneck]

It’s about projecting trump’s sexual immorality on to the family man who beat hm in the election. The same thing happened with Roy Moore (trump’s candidate) ...

Any excuse to excuse Joe’s deviant behavior right ?

 

[Arthur Brain]

Why can't you just say, "YES, I condemn touching children in inappropriate places, with the exception of changing diapers, treating infections, etc"?

Perhaps it's my fault for oversimplifying the question in order to cover the widest range of possibilities with regards to pedophilia.

Allow me to ask again (to both you and @Arthur Brain).

Do you condemn touching children in inappropriate places, barring medical treatment, basic hygiene, and any reason that is non-sexual by nature?

Yes or no.

Probably because, like me, he's not interested in jumping through your hoops and parameters. See Expos4ever's response on the matter. This is ridiculous.

 

[Leatherneck]

Probably because, like me, he's not interested in jumping through your hoops and parameters. See Expos4ever's response on the matter. This is ridiculous.

Bingo ! Those on the left want no barriers.

 

[expos4ever]

Thank you for considering me a nut. If I were to be in agreement with your chosen perversion and spiritual blindness I would ask God’s forgiveness.

You may think this is an effective rejoinder. But let's be clear: no one reading this thread who does not come to it with an emotional need to believe Joe Biden is a pedophile will think that what is seen in that video is anything remotely inappropriate.

But let's explore this further. What about the image of Jesus that was posted earlier this morning? His hand appears to be straying dangerously close to a red zone. Is Jesus a pedo?

Get real guys: nobody with a lick of sense will see perversion in that video of Biden.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Bingo ! Those on the left want no barriers.

Not what I said or promote at all but hey, I was hardly expecting a logical, reasoned response from you anyway.

 

[Leatherneck]

You may think this is an effective rejoinder. But let's be clear: no one reading this thread who does not come to it with an emotional need to believe Joe Biden is a pedophile will think that what is seen in that video is anything remotely inappropriate.

But let's explore this further. What about the image of Jesus that was posted earlier this morning? His hand appears to be straying dangerously close to a red zone. Is Jesus a pedo?

Get real guys: nobody with a lick of sense will see perversion in that video of Biden.

You want to compare a picture to a real life event ? Typical liberal non response to reality.

 

[Leatherneck]

Not what I said or promote at all but hey, I was hardly expecting a logical, reasoned response from you anyway.

No what you expect is capitulation into your depraved way of thinking. Not happening.