Search results

A Biblical System for Appointing Judges: A natural question arises from my previous post on the role of the judiciary in a constitutional monarchy. If judges are to derive their authority directly from the constitution rather than from the king, how then would they be appointed and on what...

Does anyone have a copy of the proposed code of use and criminal code?

A Proposed Monarch Removal Mechanism: One of the most pressing concerns I have regarding the proposed constitutional monarchy is the absence of any mechanism to remove a rogue king. This is not a mere theoretical issue, but a critical flaw that could doom the entire system. While the proposal...

All of that is MY argument, not yours! It is because prophesy has to do with Israel and not the Body of Christ that we know that preterism is false. We KNOW it is false. It isn't a theory, it isn't a hypothesis, it isn't an opinion. If preterism is true then Paul is a false apostle and...

I noticed that you completely ignored (or more likely missed) the point of the argument but that doesn't matter. You aren't interested in whether your beliefs make any sense. It's the fact that you believe in the creeds that's your first and most important error. The only creed you need to worry...

You're stupid. Good bye!

In addition to Jesus following the law exactly, He was also outsmarting His opponents. The Jews were not allowed to execute people without consent from the Roman authorities. The people who brought the woman before Jesus were trying to get him into trouble with the authorities and had Jesus...

Beat me to the punch! Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.

I don't have one.

Was this a joke? The entire Biden administration was one HUMONGOUS national security threat! ON PURPOSE!!! Someone made a mistake, sure, but it was totally harmless! It isn't the collassal security disaster you mindless liberals are trying to sell it as. You all are stupid and the American...

:ROFLMAO: You need to turn off CNN and MSNBC!

That's one of my favorite sayings. I should say it out loud more often. It has meaning from more than one direction.

Perhaps but I didn't see it at first myself and so I'm willing to give him some time on it. The Transcendental Argument for the existence of God. It's what I presented in post 76.

I really don't think he understands the argument. I recall when Hilston first introduced me to the TAG. I didn't get it for the longest time! If felt contradictory to me at first. Then one day, the light came on and now I can't understand how I didn't see it from the beginning. Both the TAG...

I did answer it! What are you even talking about? I've proven that you cannot even ask the question without presupposing that MY worldview is true! The very fact that you are here is PROOF that you are wrong! Further, reason is not just another biological function, like digestion or...

I know of no Open Theist who would ever suggest such a thing. There are plenty of Classical theists who would do so! Calvinists in particular very often believe that the TULIP is the very gospel itself! Biblically, however, all that is required to be saved is to believe the following things...

I've presented more than evidence, I've present proof! You seem too dull to have perceived it.

I'm spending my life right now calling you a liar! The worst kind of liar! The naive that lies to himself! You're not just a liar, you're a hypocrite. Throughout our entire exchange, which is all still right here for the entire world to read, I have been the one presenting actual arguments that...

Your answer would be the brain but the argument I've already presented proves that there's more to it. You ignoring the argument doesn't count as a rebuttal. Do you claim to base your life on reason or don't you, Avajs? If so, then on what basis do you ignore rational arguments that pertain...

Yes, I knew that already. Neither do I, except that I don't want to be perceived as taking credit for someone else's ideas. It's the ideas that matter, not who wrote them. Do you care about ideas? This sentence does not connect with what came before or after it. Still, you showing up to state...