How will we be able to convict someone for murder because of taking A drug that prevents an eggs attachment to uterus when there is only one on three chance of its occurring at all. Seems like automatic reasonable doubt.
The act of taking the drug would be a criminal act in and of itself.
GUARANTEEING that a child doesn't attach means you intentionally cause the death of the child, AKA murder.
Women should be the deciders in chief when their eggs are fertilized by force against their will.
A husband and wife should be the only ones having children.
That said, if a man rapes a woman, and a child is conceived, you don't kill the baby, you kill the rapist.
No one, not even the mother of a child, has the right to intentionally take the life of her innocent child. It would be, by definition, unjust, and by definition, murder.
When an egg is fertilized in a test tube, is there a baby there?
Yes. Life begins at conception. The video I posted earlier shows the defining moment when it's no longer just a sperm and an egg, but a person, an innocent baby, a unique human being.
Where is it written that preventing a fertilized egg from attaching is murder?
If a fertilized egg doesn't attach, will it survive? If not, there's your answer, because that "fertilized egg" is a human being.
That's your opinion and you are welcome to it.
Opinions have nothing to do with this, other than yours.
It is a fact that human life begins at conception. That happens BEFORE implantation, and thus, preventing implantation, which results in death, is the intentional killing of an innocent human being, AKA MURDER.
But, preventing the attachment is aligning with the more usual result. You cannot deny this.
The difference is that one is intentional, the other is not. Intentionally doing so is what makes it murder.