annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
No doubt....she'd side with the devil himself if her gave her an AMEN.
No doubt you'd be right behind her, prodding her with your broom.
No doubt....she'd side with the devil himself if her gave her an AMEN.
No doubt you'd be right behind her, prodding her with your broom.
Surely you realize that man being made in the image and likeness of God has NOTHING to do with how a man looks or the color of his skin.
If that doesn't say something about your superiority complex, I don't know what does.
Or they simply don't see that their opinions about such "intense issues" have a single thing to do with their faith in God.
You aren't a believer, yourself, are you? :think:
Or you simply don't have a cogent answer. I don't think Trad will, either.
zoo nailed it, and you, as one of the nastiest Christians here, simply can't see it, because zoo hits too close to where you are.
I don't think Heir needs a lap dog. You should stick with Bybee. :dog:
It's so easy to do, though :idunno:
Not so much to Reformed Christians- there's actually stacked logic to face. That's why yall don't like uslain:
Zoo has no answer, whatsoever, and the fact that you think he does only shows me that you don't know what it means to have faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.
You can't even see me...you only project your own anger and hate onto me. I'm not surprised by that, Anna, it's a simple fact that those without faith and life have no understanding of those of us who do.
Repelled by Trad's racism. And waiting for him to explain how his racism isn't more powerful than his faith.
Then stop with your mocking attempts. I heard how you harassed heir, and you constantly try correcting everybody while taking pot shots at MADs here. Maybe you should examine yourself and your motives.
You are a good woman Anna!He does, you just can't see it.
I'm not angry, and I don't hate. I am repelled, however.
Repelled by your behavior, and the supposed Christian values you use to prop it up. It's really too bad for the forum that you have so much time on your hands. Between you and sod, you've pretty much got the 24 hours saturated.
Repelled by Trad's racism. and waiting for him to explain how his racism isn't more powerful than his faith.
Just read some of john w's recent posts defining MAD, he explains it. Nothing you say comes anywhere close to disputing MAD.
You both are. :cheers:You are a good woman Anna!
You are a good woman Anna!
You both are. :cheers:
A while back, Cruciform received an infraction (resulting in his temporary ban) basically for spam. In my anger, I wrote a thread, not so much objecting to the moderator who administered the infraction, but in defense of the so-called "spam" that Cruciform writes.
The answer that the moderator who administered the infraction gave (nor should this thread, mind you, be seen as a protest against moderation; I offer my sincere respect and gratitude to the moderator in question, in general, for her service as a moderator), and one which I very much approve, was as follows:
TOL is for dialogue. Dialogue is what drives TOL.
I disagreed then, and I disagree now, that Cruciform's "spam" is anti-dialogue.
Nonetheless, there is a certain element on this website which is exceedingly anti-dialogue. These posters, in effect, are "hit and run" posters. Get in. Throw an insult. Put the ones who disagree with them on ignore. Continue mocking said person(s). And then abdicate the thread. All, of course, without engaging in dialogue in the least.
We see an extreme case of this with the Horn. I am, in fact, not fully convinced that he's even human. If he is human, I'm not convinced that he's not on somebody's dime, one of these "hit and run" propaganda people hired by political organizations. He certainly doesn't display any signs of actually reading the threads in which he posts.
But various other subscribers, in particular, many of those of the social liberal bent, certainly do not seem interested in dialogue. They seem interested in high-fiving each other and mocking, not dialoguing with those, who disagree with them.
Therefore, moderators, I issue this "challenge" in a spirit, not of defiance and disrespect, but of jovial encouragement:
Is TOL for dialogue or not?
Was Cruciform deserving of an infraction or not? And yet his "spam" at least reveals a willingness to engage with his opponents; he evidences at least the fact that he read what his opponents have said.
The liberals? Not so much.
(That moment where they lie to each other to affirm a perception that they aren't what they exhibit)
#everythread #disturbing #Lollerskates
(That moment where they lie to each other to affirm a perception that they aren't what they exhibit)
#everythread #disturbing #Lollerskates