Asked and answered.
George Floyd killed himself with drugs.
- Thread starter Leatherneck
- Start date
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
So, is it okay as a matter of policy for other police officers to use the same restraining methods on suspects while having armed support on standby? Otherwise, you haven't answered any such thing and have shied away from it continually, for whatever reason.
Last edited:
Chauvin can appeal. If you have evidence to help him in an appeal court, you could be a witness. Do you have that evidence?
Sure do I saw it on tv when Maxine Waters and pedo Joe spoke about Chauvin before the verdict was ever reached they tainted “ blind justice” and the presumption of innocence. You do understand that concept right it is in the constitution ?
So the only evidence you have to defend Chauvin at an appeal trial was the stuff you saw on tv. Will the courtroom open up to a few million star witnesses who saw as much as you. Hmmmm.
Biden's comments don't constitute jury tampering, Schultz said, because they were "so vague" and didn't show clear intent on Biden's to influence the jurors.
"Maybe [Biden] was praying for the jury to acquit ... no one knows really what it means. It's a general statement," Schultz said.
Because Biden's comments came once the jury was already sequestered, and the president didn't specifically tell jurors how to vote, Schultz said, there is "no way" it could be construed as jury tampering.
Fact check: Biden support for 'right verdict' in Chauvin trial not illegal, expert says
Claims that President Biden's comments about the Chauvin trial were illegal, are false, according to a legal expert.eu.usatoday.com
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Why are you so determined to see Chauvin punished?
The judge and jury found him guilty; I agree with the manslaughter charges. Any sentence the court dish out will be a temporary punishment. Like the rest of us, he can still repent and have the chance of eternal salvation
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
If a retrial finds him innocent, will you accept that verdict?
As things stand at the moment he has been found guilty. It seems pointless speculating on the what ifs! Like all of us; his real trial is before God.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
By a process that many feel was corrupted.
Are you content with a verdict delivered by a corrupted process?
Feeling something is corrupt; is not the same as having evidence for that corruption.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
You've been shown evidence throughout this thread
If you have the evidence, then prove it in court. At the moment it comes across as an opinion rather than evidence. Very much in the same kind of way when Mr Trump tried to prove corrupt elections.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
That's the role of the prosecutor or the defense attorney. I am neither. As are you.
Duh
If you have evidence of corruption, then present it to the prosecutor or defense attorney. At the moment it amounts to speculation, not evidence.
Your 'DUH' weighs up the strength of your evidence. The evidence for Trump's fraudulent election pretty much ended up as 'duh'.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
We seem to be going in circles and you seem to be compelled to bring Trump into this so I will say good bye
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Exactly. The undisputed video footage shows Chauvin needlessly sitting on a man's neck for nine minutes while having colleagues, armed with guns on standby. What possible excuse is there for that in sanity land? The Trump comparison is an apt one in certain respects.
Right Divider
Body part
There is no excuse for it. It simply was not the primary cause of death.
The judge and jury do not agree with you. They saw and heard all the evidence first hand.
Right Divider
Body part
The judge and jury can be wrong.
That does not guarantee the correct verdict.