The atheist materialist needs a story of how everything came to be without a designer. That starts with how the universe came into being. You cannot have the "evolution of all life from dead matter" until you have.... dead matter.
Try running evolution without an existing universe.
Yes, so what?
Irrelevant, of course. Your tinfoil hat wearing buddy was, as usual, demonstrating his lack of knowledge of the facts.
Yes. And, in discussing the recipe for any meal, we must explain exactly how a stove works or no dinner for you.
Go ahead, try it
Did you stamp your little foot and shake your little fist when you said that?
Hilarious. Maybe specialized indoctrination.
The "science" of radiometric dating is not hard to understand at all.
Bluff and bluster.... common evolutionist tactic.
Again, the theory of evolution has no connection at all to the matter of how the world came to be. You are trying to muddy the waters here by inferring motives. The simple fact is this: the theory of evolution is completely non-committal on how the universe came to be.
Oh, is it time for you to perseverate on that dumb interpretation again?
Interpretation? It's English, buddy.
The theory of evolution assumes God did not create life on earth even though evolutionists claim evolution speculations make no claims or assumptions about origins. If God did create life on earth then evolution is a lie. No wonder evolutionists want to pretend ignorance about origins.
Atheists and humanists claim the earth is billions of years old but they cannot prove it without using unproven speculations as a basis for their 'scientific' assumptions.
God-rejecting secular science speculations are often complicated, contradictory, and scientifically improbable or impossible.
Evolution has no logical foundation. It claims ignorance about supernatural forces involved and yet insists supernatural forces were not involved.
Evolutionists assume as a foundational doctrine that God did not create life on earth and yet evolutionists claim they remain ignorant of whether or not God was involved.
Think what you are, by implication, asking people to believe. You are asking them to believe that tens of thousands of highly trained experts - with real jobs they can lose if discovered to be lying - are collaborating in a vast conspiracy to deceive the world into thinking that we evolved from lower forms when there is no good evidence to support this view. If you are willing to take such notions seriously, you can dismiss any well-established scientific finding.
Another of your many error (or lies). Evolution is nothing if not logical - it is a powerful explanatory framework that makes sense of vast quantities of data.
The notion that random scrambling of genetic code will produce increases in function is not logical
Let's talk science instead of fallacies.
It's the opposite of logical and certainly anti-science.