Liberal extremists.

Danoh

New member
I know self-professed liberals -- on the whole generally nice people, or at least tolerable -- who have said they would have no problem with the government silencing opinions they don't agree with and forcibly disarming everyone they don't like (of course they don't phrase it that way but that's what it amounts to). Do you consider such the exception or the rule...are they aberrations or just average?

Another question. What would Hillary have been had you gotten your way and she were now POTUS: curse or blessing?

Sorry, fool, but I neither voted for Trump, nor for Hillary.

Likewise as to the rest of your one-sided nonsense - not worth bothering to answer beyond an "if you say so, fool."

It just boggles the mind how you and your kind are consistently wrong in the simplest of things.

:chuckle:

Rom. 5:6-8.
 
Last edited:

Danoh

New member
You think the Pharisees were right!!?? :shocked:

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

You saying wrong is right doesn't change things.

:rotfl:



Liberals.

This is like how cultures painted Jesus in their own likeness. It looks like you think that not only would Jesus have voted — He wouldn't have and won't — He would have voted the way you do.

Laughable.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

What I said to your pal Musti also applies to you, your Extreme-ness.

:chuckle:

Rom. 5:6-8.
 

musterion

Well-known member
Nope.

Case in point: The Pharisees would be considered Far Right Fundamentalist:.

No. Christ said they made the Word of God to no effect because of their traditions, on top of the fact that they were faithless to begin with, which caused their blatant hypocrisy whenever they did self-servingly cite God's Word.

So their modern equivalent would be religious liberals -- those with a veneer of righteousness but denying any and all power of true righteousness, leaving them nothing but self-righteousness. That's the defining mark of both Pharisees and modern liberal "Christians." They themselves -- not God or His Word -- are the true measure of all things.

Pharisees would absolutely not be fundamentalists, who tend to truly believe what they say they believe, even if they wrongly divide the Word.
 

Danoh

New member
No. Christ said they made the Word of God to no effect because of their traditions, on top of the fact that they were faithless to begin with, which caused their blatant hypocrisy whenever they did self-servingly cite God's Word.

So their modern equivalent would be religious liberals -- those with a veneer of righteousness but denying any and all power of true righteousness, leaving them nothing but self-righteousness. That's the defining mark of both Pharisees and modern liberal "Christians."

They would absolutely not be fundamentalists who tend to at least truly believe what they say they believe, even if they wrongly divide the Word.

Nope, wrong again - they were not all like that.

As a result, we run across passages like this one.

Acts 15:5 But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.

You might want to re-read Matthew thru John.

And finally, you stepped up to the plate with an actual discussion on something in Scripture absent of your usual animosity - even though you were still wrong.

:rotfl:

Still, thanks for that much "BRO."

:chuckle:

Rom. 5:6-8.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
No. Christ said they made the Word of God to no effect because of their traditions, on top of the fact that they were faithless to begin with, which caused their blatant hypocrisy whenever they did self-servingly cite God's Word.

So their modern equivalent would be religious liberals -- those with a veneer of righteousness but denying any and all power of true righteousness, leaving them nothing but self-righteousness. That's the defining mark of both Pharisees and modern liberal "Christians." They themselves -- not God or His Word -- are the true measure of all things.

Pharisees would absolutely not be fundamentalists, who tend to truly believe what they say they believe, even if they wrongly divide the Word.

Would they call people "fags" in semi private correspondence?

:think:
 

Danoh

New member
What? :AMR:

When are you going to start making sense? Do you think Jesus is going to vote when He returns?

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Well, since you think you've a valid point by that, in a way, yeah, He will be voting when He returns.

Matthew 25:31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: 25:32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:

25:33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left. 25:34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

25:41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:

25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

Of course, I'm being sheepish.

:chuckle:

By the way, not sure if you too are as anemic to links being posted to you, as some on here are, but here is a link to a book you might find interesting...

Its a presentation of "a Biblically-based cosmogony that includes the Biblical explanation of: The Origin of the Languages - The Origin of the Continents - The Origin of the Races" and so on.

And is by that Pastor (R. Dawson Barlow or Sun Ming) with the huge, huge underground Mid-Acts house churches ministry throughout China, that I once mentioned to you.

https://www.amazon.com/ORIGIN-RACES-Ming-Dawson-Barlow-ebook/dp/B001J2Z4QI

Rom. 5:6-8.
 
Last edited:

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Of course, I'm being sheepish.

That's obvious. Jesus won't be voting, nor will anyone else with regards to His rule.

However, liberal extremists — apologies for the repetition — think democracy is the saviour.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
 

Danoh

New member
That's obvious. Jesus won't be voting, nor will anyone else with regards to His rule.

However, liberal extremists — apologies for the repetition — think democracy is the saviour.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

True - John Lennon and company.

But that's the world for ya; its a given in such.

At the same time, on the other end of that extreme are those within the Far Right who are Kingdom NOW.

Even SOME so called "MADs."

For one would think that of all people within Christianity, the Madist would know better.

Talk about the double-standard of wanting a thing both ways...

But such take "personal umbrage" when their ignorance of the following is pointed out to them...

Romans 11:25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. 11:26 And so ALL ISRAEL shall be saved: AS IT IS WRITTEN, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: 11:27 For this is my covenant unto THEM, when I shall take away THEIR sins.

Rom. 5:6-8.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Looks like you're searching for a label to argue with.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
 

Danoh

New member
Looks like you're searching for a label to argue with.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

The irony, given your extensive use of labels - very narrow ones at that - in your above posts.

What is it with your kind that you all suffer from a really bad case of self-awareness myopia.

Fact is that you projected this mis-fire of yours into...what I said.

:chuckle:

Rom. 5:6-8.
 
Last edited:

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
The irony, given your ectensive use of labels - very narrow ones at that - in your above posts.What is it with your kind that you all suffer from a really bad case of self-awareness myopia.Fact is that you projected this mis-fire of yours into...what I said.chuckle:eek:m. 5:6-8.

Well, this thread was about something, ie, how liberals are extremists.

I'm not an extremist. I'm a right-wing fundamentalist. :up:

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
:chuckle:

I just assume you're all trolls. ;)

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
 

The Horn

BANNED
Banned
Stripe , conservatives are extremists, and liberals are pansies . You've got things reversed .
In America, people calling themselves "conservatives " are opposed to everything that is good for this country. . They are anti-freedom, anti-progress, anti-equality and anti-justice .
Supposedly, conservatism means wanting to preserve the best of the past . But American conservatives are trying to return to the WORST of America's past, and then some .
They claim to be "constitutionalists ,", but they actually have absolutely no understanding of our constitution, and use it to try to further their fascist and theocratic agenda . The Constitution is whatever THEY say it is . If they want to ban something and make it illegal, they use the Constitution to demand this . If they want to make something evil legal, they also use it .
Or to make something mandatory which is actually totally unconstitutional, such as mandatory school prayer and Bible readings .
American conservatives claim to be for "liberty ", but they want liberty for themselves and no one else . And liberty to violate the rights of others, particularly gay people .
To these right-wing extremists , only heterosexual Christian Americans have any rights . Mostly white heterosexual Christians, and mostly white heterosexual female Christians .
If you are not a Christian, or in some cases even a Catholic , if you are gay or LGBT , an atheist or agnostic , you are a second class citizen to them.
These conservatives tolerate women only if they agree with them on issues and share the same religion and don't want to assert their rights as women . If you are a liberal black, Hispanic, a Muslim , you are also a second class citizen .
Conservative don't believe in equality if you are a black or Hispanic or non-white and don't toe the conservative line . Conservatives don't like the poor, the struggling middle class , the unemployed , the disabled, elderly and infirm people etc .
If you were born poor, or have been impoverished through unemployment , are too disabled to work , are elderly and infirm, you are a "lazy bum" who doesn't want to work and wants to liv in luxury while the government allegedly takes hard-earned money form those who do work .
It's all YOUR fault , and you don't deserve any help from the government .
The government has absolutely no business providing for people in need, including children and infants, because this would be "socialism", and we know socialism is the same thing as communism and automatically leads to government tyranny and killing millions of innocent people .
Conservatives talk glibly about the need for "self-reliance", but this is just a code word for the government denying help to people who are down on their luck .
If you are rich, you deserve to be rich , because you are smarter than poor people and you worked hard . Poor people deserve to be poor because they're lazy . And so on .
 
Top