The Late Great Urantia Revelation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Charity

New member
Jesus led the wise men: with Astrology. Herod listened to familiar spirits
John heard directly from The Lord. One who hates his brother doesn't need an excuse, he hates everyone. Are you agreeing that Christians hear Jesus' Voice or not?

Now about the time Mary was in labour on earth, a woman In heaven was getting ready to deliver a Man child..And a Dragon apeared, his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born. And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and was not God! and to his throne.

He Who stood before Mary as she delivered was not her friend!
Jesus was to rule the Nationsssss. with a iron rod! yet they over came Them by the BLOOD OF THE LAMB. by cutting him off. h

The woman was separated from her Child, an fled to the wilderness. where did the Dragon go?


I can go on...
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned




THE MACHIVENTA INCARNATION


http://truthbook.com/urantia-book/paper-93-machiventa-melchizedek



93:1.1 Revealed truth was threatened with extinction during the millenniums which followed the miscarriage of the Adamic mission on Urantia. Though making progress intellectually, the human races were slowly losing ground spiritually. About 3000 B.C. the concept of God had grown very hazy in the minds of men.

93:1.2 The twelve Melchizedek receivers knew of Michael's impending bestowal on their planet, but they did not know how soon it would occur; therefore they convened in solemn council and petitioned the Most Highs of Edentia that some provision be made for maintaining the light of truth on Urantia. This plea was dismissed with the mandate that "the conduct of affairs on 606 of Satania is fully in the hands of the Melchizedek custodians." The receivers then appealed to the Father Melchizedek for help but only received word that they should continue to uphold truth in the manner of their own election "until the arrival of a bestowal Son," who "would rescue the planetary titles from forfeiture and uncertainty."


THE SAGE OF SALEM



93:2.1 It was 1,973 years before the birth of Jesus that Machiventa was bestowed upon the human races of Urantia. His coming was unspectacular; his materialization was not witnessed by human eyes. He was first observed by mortal man on that eventful day when he entered the tent of Amdon, a Chaldean herder of Sumeriann extraction. And the proclamation of his mission was embodied in the simple statement which he made to this shepherd, "I am Melchizedek, priest of El Elyon, the Most High, the one and only God."

93:2.2 When the herder had recovered from his astonishment, and after he had plied this stranger with many questions, he asked Melchizedek to sup with him, and this was the first time in his long universe career that Machiventa had partaken of material food, the nourishment which was to sustain him throughout his ninety-four years of life as a material being.

93:2.3 And that night, as they talked out under the stars, Melchizedek began his mission of the revelation of the truth of the reality of God when, with a sweep of his arm, he turned to Amdon, saying, "El Elyon, the Most High, is the divine creator of the stars of the firmament and even of this very earth on which we live, and he is also the supreme God of heaven."

93:2.4 Within a few years Melchizedek had gathered around himself a group of pupils, disciples, and believers who formed the nucleus of the later community of Salem. He was soon known throughout Palestine as the priest of El Elyon, the Most High, and as the sage of Salem. Among some of the surrounding tribes he was often referred to as the sheik, or king, of Salem. Salem was the site which after the disappearance of Melchizedek became the city of Jebus, subsequently being called Jerusalem.

93:2.5 In personal appearance, Melchizedek resembled the then blended Nodite and Sumerian peoples, being almost six feet in height and possessing a commanding presence. He spoke Chaldean and a half dozen other languages. He dressed much as did the Canaanite priests except that on his breast he wore an emblem of three concentric circles, the Satania symbol of the Paradise Trinity. In the course of his ministry this insignia of three concentric circles became regarded as so sacred by his followers that they never dared to use it, and it was soon forgotten with the passing of a few generations.

93:2.6 Though Machiventa lived after the manner of the men of the realm, he never married, nor could he have left offspring on earth. His physical body, while resembling that of the human male, was in reality on the order of those especially constructed bodies used by the one hundred materialized members of Prince Caligastia's staff except that it did not carry the life plasm of any human race. Nor was there available on Urantia the tree of life. Had Machiventa remained for any long period on earth, his physical mechanism would have gradually deteriorated; as it was, he terminated his bestowal mission in ninety-four years long before his material body had begun to disintegrate."




THE SELECTION OF ABRAHAM



93:5.1 "Although it may be an error to speak of "chosen people," it is not a mistake to refer to Abraham as a chosen individual. Melchizedek did lay upon Abraham the responsibility of keeping alive the truth of one God as distinguished from the prevailing belief in plural deities.

93:5.2 The choice of Palestine as the site for Machiventa's activities was in part predicated upon the desire to establish contact with some human family embodying the potentials of leadership. At the time of the incarnation of Melchizedek there were many families on earth just as well prepared to receive the doctrine of Salem as was that of Abraham. There were equally endowed families among the red men, the yellow men, and the descendants of the Andites to the west and north. But, again, none of these localities were so favorably situated for Michael's subsequent appearance on earth as was the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea. The Melchizedek mission in Palestine and the subsequent appearance of Michael among the Hebrew people were in no small measure determined by geography, by the fact that Palestine was centrally located with reference to the then existent trade, travel, and civilization of the world."
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
This is why Johns gospel has more on the conversation between Pilate and Jesus. It's because John was the accompanying witness on Jesus behalf during the proceedings. So John was allowed into Pilates judgment hall with Jesus, there were just the (3) of them.


THE PRIVATE EXAMINATION BY PILATE



185:3.1 Pilate took Jesus and John Zebedee into a private chamber, leaving the guards outside in the hall, and requesting the prisoner to sit down, he sat down by his side and asked several questions. Pilate began his talk with Jesus by assuring him that he did not believe the first count against him: that he was a perverter of the nation and an inciter to rebellion. Then he asked, “Did you ever teach that tribute should be refused Caesar?” Jesus, pointing to John, said, “Ask him or any other man who has heard my teaching.” Then Pilate questioned John about this matter of tribute, and John testified concerning his Master’s teaching and explained that Jesus and his apostles paid taxes both to Caesar and to the temple. When Pilate had questioned John, he said, “See that you tell no man that I talked with you.” And John never did reveal this matter.


185:3.2 Pilate then turned around to question Jesus further, saying: “And now about the third accusation against you, are you the king of the Jews?” Since there was a tone of possibly sincere inquiry in Pilate’s voice, Jesus smiled on the procurator and said: “Pilate, do you ask this for yourself, or do you take this question from these others, my accusers?” Whereupon, in a tone of partial indignation, the governor answered: “Am I a Jew? Your own people and the chief priests delivered you up and asked me to sentence you to death. I question the validity of their charges and am only trying to find out for myself what you have done. Tell me, have you said that you are the king of the Jews, and have you sought to found a new kingdom?”

185:3.3 Then said Jesus to Pilate: “Do you not perceive that my kingdom is not of this world? If my kingdom were of this world, surely would my disciples fight that I should not be delivered into the hands of the Jews. My presence here before you in these bonds is sufficient to show all men that my kingdom is a spiritual dominion, even the brotherhood of men who, through faith and by love, have become the sons of God. And this salvation is for the gentile as well as for the Jew.”


185:3.4 “Then you are a king after all?” said Pilate. And Jesus answered: “Yes, I am such a king, and my kingdom is the family of the faith sons of my Father who is in heaven. For this purpose was I born into this world, even that I should show my Father to all men and bear witness to the truth of God. And even now do I declare to you that every one who loves the truth hears my voice.”



185:3.5 Then said Pilate, half in ridicule and half in sincerity, “Truth, what is truth—who knows?”

185:3.6 Pilate was not able to fathom Jesus’ words, nor was he able to understand the nature of his spiritual kingdom, but he was now certain that the prisoner had done nothing worthy of death. One look at Jesus, face to face, was enough to convince even Pilate that this gentle and weary, but majestic and upright, man was no wild and dangerous revolutionary who aspired to establish himself on the temporal throne of Israel. Pilate thought he understood something of what Jesus meant when he called himself a king, for he was familiar with the teachings of the Stoics, who declared that “the wise man is king.” Pilate was thoroughly convinced that, instead of being a dangerous seditionmonger, Jesus was nothing more or
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
Ya know how the Jews still just don't get it and you wonder why? Same thing, religious people develop a closed minded pride that forbids them from hearing revelation when it's right in front of them.

But you added things like Jesus saying he was here for the gentiles too, and that Jesus is Michael. Glaring mistakes, not to mention changing scripture which makes the Urantia papers and writers accursed.


Galatians 1:8 KJV - Revelation 22:19 KJV -
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
But you added things like Jesus saying he was here for the gentiles too, and that Jesus is Michael. Glaring mistakes, not to mention changing scripture which makes the Urantia papers and writers accursed.


Galatians 1:8 KJV - Revelation 22:19 KJV -

LOL! Well. you are a Gentile Patrick. Do you think Jesus actually called you a "dog" as the Jewish authors remembered???????

Michael is the heavenly name of Jesus. While incarnate on earth he was given the name Joshua as instructed by Gabriel.
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
LOL! Well. you are a Gentile Patrick. Do you think Jesus actually called you a "dog" as the Jewish authors remembered???????

Michael is the heavenly name of Jesus. While incarnate on earth he was given the name Joshua as instructed by Gabriel.

Yes, Christ delivered the gospel of the gentiles to Paul only. Now you even change the name of God. :rapture:
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
Yes, Christ delivered the gospel of the gentiles to Paul only. Now you even change the name of God. :rapture:

There was only one original gospel, after the cross the gospel changed and became about Jesus dyeing on the cross as a human sacrifice. Paul was never taught by Jesus in the flesh. Before Jesus ascended into heaven he told the original remaining 11 apostles to preach the original gospel to the 4 corners of the earth. Paul wasn't even in the picture yet.

And Jesus did teach non-Jews the original gospel but as you can tell by the other Jews on this site they are religiously proud people who don't like to share with outsiders. So nothing is said in the gospels about Jesus also preaching to Gentiles.


"The Apostle Paul, in his efforts to bring the teachings of Jesus to the favorable notice of certain groups in his day, wrote many letters of instruction and admonition. Other teachers of Jesus' gospel did likewise, but none of them realized that some of these writings would subsequently be brought together by those who would set them forth as the embodiment of the teachings of Jesus. And so, while so-called Christianity does contain more of the Master's gospel than any other religion, it does also contain much that Jesus did not teach. Aside from the incorporation of many teachings from the Persian mysteries and much of the Greek philosophy into early Christianity, two great mistakes were made:


1. The effort to connect the gospel teaching directly onto the Jewish theology, as illustrated by the Christian doctrines of the atonement —the teaching that Jesus was the sacrificed Son who would satisfy the Father's stern justice and appease the divine wrath. These teachings originated in a praiseworthy effort to make the gospel of the kingdom more acceptable to disbelieving Jews. Though these efforts failed as far as winning the Jews was concerned, they did not fail to confuse and alienate many honest souls in all subsequent generations.

2. The second great blunder of the Master's early followers, and one which all subsequent generations have persisted in perpetuating, was to organize the Christian teaching so completely about the person of Jesus. This overemphasis of the personality of Jesus in the theology of Christianity has worked to obscure his teachings, and all of this has made it increasingly difficult for Jews, Mohammedans, Hindus, and other Eastern religionists to accept the teachings of Jesus. We would not belittle the place of the person of Jesus in a religion which might bear his name, but we would not permit such consideration to eclipse his inspired life or to supplant his saving message: the fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man." UB1955
 
Last edited:

Caino

BANNED
Banned
Creation and the evolution of our solar system and earth.



The Urantia Book

Paper 57

THE ORIGIN OF URANTIA​

[Presented by a Life Carrier, a member of the original Urantia Corps and now a resident observer.]​


57:0.1 "IN PRESENTING EXCERPTS from the archives of Jerusem for the records of Urantia respecting its antecedents and early history, we are directed to reckon time in terms of current usage—the present leap-year calendar of 365¼ days to the year. As a rule, no attempt will be made to give exact years, though they are of record. We will use the nearest whole numbers as the better method of presenting these historic facts.

57:0.2 When referring to an event as of one or two millions of years ago, we intend to date such an occurrence back that number of years from the early decades of the twentieth century of the Christian era. We will thus depict these far-distant events as occurring in even periods of thousands, millions, and billions of years."



http://truthbook.com/urantia-book/paper-57-the-origin-of-urantia
 

freelight

Eclectic Theosophist
The evolution of Yahweh-Elohim

The evolution of Yahweh-Elohim

Origin's of the name Yahweh



DEITY CONCEPTS AMONG THE SEMITES



96:1.1 "The early Semites regarded everything as being indwelt by a spirit. There were spirits of the animal and vegetable worlds; annual spirits, the lord of progeny; spirits of fire, water, and air; a veritable pantheon of spirits to be feared and worshiped. And the teaching of Melchizedek regarding a Universal Creator never fully destroyed the belief in these subordinate spirits or nature gods.

96:1.2 The progress of the Hebrews from polytheism through henotheism to monotheism was not an unbroken and continuous conceptual development. They experienced many retrogressions in the evolution of their Deity concepts, while during any one epoch there existed varying ideas of God among different groups of Semite believers. From time to time numerous terms were applied to their concepts of God, and in order to prevent confusion these various Deity titles will be defined as they pertain to the evolution of Jewish theology:


96:1.3 1. Yahweh was the god of the southern Palestinian tribes, who associated this concept of deity with Mount Horeb, the Sinai volcano. Yahweh was merely one of the hundreds and thousands of nature gods which held the attention and claimed the worship of the Semitic tribes and peoples.

96:1.4 2. El Elyon. For centuries after Melchizedek's sojourn at Salem his doctrine of Deity persisted in various versions but was generally connoted by the term El Elyon, the Most High God of heaven. Many Semites, including the immediate descendants of Abraham, at various times worshiped both Yahweh and El Elyon.

96:1.5 3. El Shaddai. It is difficult to explain what El Shaddai stood for. This idea of God was a composite derived from the teachings of Amenemope's Book of Wisdom modified by Ikhnaton's doctrine of Aton and further influenced by Melchizedek's teachings embodied in the concept of El Elyon. But as the concept of El Shaddai permeated the Hebrew mind, it became thoroughly colored with the Yahweh beliefs of the desert.

96:1.6 One of the dominant ideas of the religion of this era was the Egyptian concept of divine Providence, the teaching that material prosperity was a reward for serving El Shaddai.

96:1.7 4. El. Amid all this confusion of terminology and haziness of concept, many devout believers sincerely endeavored to worship all of these evolving ideas of divinity, and there grew up the practice of referring to this composite Deity as El. And this term included still other of the Bedouin nature gods.

96:1.8 5. Elohim. In Kish and Ur there long persisted Sumerian-Chaldean groups who taught a three-in-one God concept founded on the traditions of the days of Adam and Melchizedek. This doctrine was carried to Egypt, where this Trinity was worshiped under the name of Elohim, or in the singular as Eloah. The philosophic circles of Egypt and later Alexandrian teachers of Hebraic extraction taught this unity of pluralistic Gods, and many of Moses' advisers at the time of the exodus believed in this Trinity. But the concept of the trinitarian Elohim never became a real part of Hebrew theology until after they had come under the political influence of the Babylonians.

96:1.9 6. Sundry names. The Semites disliked to speak the name of their Deity, and they therefore resorted to numerous appellations from time to time, such as: The Spirit of God, The Lord, The Angel of the Lord, The Almighty, The Holy One, The Most High, Adonai, The Ancient of Days, The Lord God of Israel, The Creator of heaven and Earth, Kyrios, Jah, The Lord of Hosts, and The Father in Heaven.

96:1.10Jehovah is a term which in recent times has been employed to designate the completed concept of Yahweh which finally evolved in the long Hebrews experience. But the name Jehovah did not come into use until fifteen hundred years after the times of Jesus.

96:1.11 Up to about 2000 B.C., Mount Horeb was intermittently active as a volcano, occasional eruptions occurring as late as the time of the sojourn of the Israelites in this region. The fire and smoke, together with the thunderous detonations associated with the eruptions of this volcanic mountain, all impressed and awed the Bedouins of the surrounding regions and caused them greatly to fear Yahweh. This spirit of Mount Horeb later became the god of the Hebrew Semite, and they eventually believed him to be supreme over all other gods.

96:1.12 The Canaanites had long revered Yahweh, and although many of the Kenites believed more or less in El Elyon, the supergod of the Salem religion, a majority of the Canaanites held loosely to the worship of the old tribal deities. They were hardly willing to abandon their national deities in favor of an international, not to say an interplanetary, God. They were not universal-deity minded, and therefore these tribes continued to worship their tribal deities, including Yahweh and the silver and golden calves which symbolized the Bedouin herders' concept of the spirit of the Sinai volcano.

96:1.13 The Syrians, while worshiping their gods, also believed in Yahweh of the Hebrews, for their prophets said to the Syrian king: "Their gods are gods of the hills; therefore they were stronger than we; but let us fight against them on the plain, and surely we shall be stronger than they."

96:1.14 As man advances in culture, the lesser gods are subordinated to a supreme deity; the great Jove persists only as an exclamation. The monotheists keep their subordinate gods as spirits, demons, fates, Nereids, fairies, brownies, dwarfs, banshees, and the evil eye. The Hebrews passed through henotheism and long believed in the existence of gods other than Yahweh, but they increasingly held that these foreign deities were subordinate to Yahweh. They conceded the actuality of Chemosh, god of the Amorites, but maintained that he was subordinate to Yahweh.

96:1.15 The idea of Yahweh has undergone the most extensive development of all the mortal theories of God. Its progressive evolution can only be compared with the metamorphosis of the Buddha concept in Asia, which in the end led to the concept of the Universal Absolute even as the Yahweh concept finally led to the idea of the Universal Father. But as a matter of historic fact, it should be understood that, while the Jews thus changed their views of Deity from the tribal god of Mount Horeb to the loving and merciful Creator Father of later times, they did not change his name; they continued all the way along to call this evolving concept of Deity, Yahweh." UB 1955

Most interesting is the evolution of 'Yahweh', is that such a name (if derived from 'ahayah') is self-subsisting as the One who 'IS', or meaning 'He Is'....denoting Self-existing Deity, he who exists apart from time, and in all time...."he who is, was and is to come" since the "I AM" is consciousness recognizing itself, in the eternal Now, yet seeing all past and future as intertwined in the present, so that God-Presence will always be there for his creation, to 'be' and 'be-come' whatever his creation desires for the inherent good and joy of their prosperity, since the Creator lives to care for and sustain its creation. "I will be for them whatever I will be", "I Shall be their provider". "I Am, and because I Am, I am all"

The tetragrammaton in itself is most interesting, 'YHWH' (4 consonants), and the name Moses got while inquiring what name to tell the Israelites who sent him, was 'Ehyeh asher Ehyeh' ('I Am', 'I WIll Be'), so is this really a 'name' or a 'description' of the elohim of the Jews, furthermore the coumpound of Yahweh-elohim (Lord God) is sometimes used. The name itself is regarded so holy as not to be uttered and replaced with the word 'Adonai' (Lord) or 'HaShem' (the Name),...so again here, how do we differentiate the real name of 'God' from various descriptions and 'titles' that are given to this 'God'? In any case, the evolution is peculiar and 'names/titles' are more 'man-made' in nature, per his own description.

In a primary Gnostic tradition, 'YHWH' is thought to be the 'Demi-urge', and not the true Most High God,...being a creator-demi-god who made an imperfect creation (this world) who actually believes he is 'God' (boasting "I am God and there is no other") imposing upon man a religious system of heavy burdens and rules (Mosaic law and rule system), but also some good principles (10 commandments, wisdom sayings).

In the fullness of time the 'Living Father' (the true Most High God) sends down his Son Jesus, a true divine eon or luminary of the Father's light to give man the true gospel of the kingdom of based on love's law.... gathering in a brotherhood of mankind under the Fatherhood of the One True God. There are variations of this theme of course, and the UB revelation agrees that the The Universal Father allowed a time for a renewal of knowledge and revelation to come in writing illuminating Jesus true character, his ministry and Lordship of our world as Our Creator Son and his place within the celestial hierarchy.

Furthermore, the UB indicates that 'God' the Universal Father has never revealed his 'name' to any of the inhabited worlds of the cosmos, but has revealed his 'nature', whereby sentient beings then gave 'God' various names and titles they saw fitting for their concept or understanding of Deity.

1:1.1 Of all the names by which God the Father is known throughout the universes, those which designate him as the First Source and the Universe Center are most often encountered. The First Father is known by various names in different universes and in different sectors of the same universe. The names which the creature assigns to the Creator are much dependent on the creature's concept of the Creator. The First Source and Universe Center has never revealed himself by name, only by nature. If we believe that we are the children of this Creator, it is only natural that we should eventually call him Father. But this is the name of our own choosing, and it grows out of the recognition of our personal relationship with the First Source and Center.
More here in Paper 1 on The Universal Father.
 

freelight

Eclectic Theosophist
First research/read/ponder the material before judging......

First research/read/ponder the material before judging......

Fake writings !!


Not sure any religious philosophical writings can be "fake", unless you have read a substantial amount of the material first to make such a determination. On that count if you're up for the challenge, read the first 5 papers (each paper is not too long), and then you can report back how fake, erroneous or wrong the material is, and provide specifics. Index for online study edition here.

1. The Universal Father
2. The Nature of God
3. The Attributes of God
4. God's Relation to the Universe
5. God's Relation to the Individual


As you know these are fundamental themes above, so whatever a text has to say about them, would be pretty important.

The Foreword may be a little more advanced as it provided a synopsis for the whole of the revelation, so you can skip that part, unless you want to attempt to read thru or browse thru it. But the papers themselves is where the bulk of details and descriptions are provided, and regards to the whole of the revelation,....papers 1-12 provide the primary scaffolding or context in which the whole of existence is referred, concerning the nature of God, the Paradise Trinity, the 3 eternal divine personalities, and God's relationship to creation and individual beings within the Grand Universe (or Universe of universes).
 

Aimiel

Well-known member
Urantia has ALL the hallmarks of a cult of fake religion. Fakirs wrote it through channelling and it's 100% lies, since it contains plagiarized Scriptures and is full of half-truths, which are equal to whole-lies.
 

TulipBee

BANNED
Banned
Urantia has ALL the hallmarks of a cult of fake religion. Fakirs wrote it through channelling and it's 100% lies, since it contains plagiarized Scriptures and is full of half-truths, which are equal to whole-lies.
Who are the celestial beings that inspired that book according to Wikipedia?
 

freelight

Eclectic Theosophist
LEARN for yourself.....or are you really interested?

LEARN for yourself.....or are you really interested?

Who are the celestial beings that inspired that book according to Wikipedia?

Why not access the primary UB sites and resources to find the answer to your inquiry, or read the book itself ? Wiki is a wonderful resource, but it will direct you to appropriate websites too. If you're really interested in the papers, you can access the freely available information, as we've been discussing thru-out this entire thread. I really tire of the petty haggling and ignorance paraded here by folks who are just here to berate or disparage the material, having no real desire for discussion. Its a waste of time,....considering what I've already invested in using this platform as an exploration of consciousness, making such available for those who want to engage in 'creative dialogue'. A locked mind can never be free to explore new dimensions or be readily available for new revelation. A mind locked in dogma is self-sabotaging. A new freedom in the Spirit is essential to set wings to flight into the unknown to receive new revelations.

At the end of each paper (in the first 3 Parts), the name and/or order of the celestial personality who authored or arranged the paper is listed.

You will find more info. in the Forward, especially the 'Acknowledgement' at the end of the foreward. See Index here.

Concerning Part 4 on the life/ministry of Jesus,...Papers 120 & 121 will inform you about what planetary sources and other resources were used in the production of those accounts. You see how all this information is available? If you're really interested in learning you will educate yourself with the helps provided, then you can actually engage in an informed discussion here, - that's kinda the purpose of the thread. Otherwise, I don't know how to help you, besides what I've been discussing with you so far :idunno:
There comes a time of 'exhaustion' of discussion, and one may be best suited to spend his time elsewhere. While I welcome inter-action here of course, please do respect what it takes to engage in discussion here. - common courtesy and respect.
 

freelight

Eclectic Theosophist
No 'aliens' involved here.......no UFO's either (as defined by pop-culture)

No 'aliens' involved here.......no UFO's either (as defined by pop-culture)

What is the difference between celestial beings and alien beings?


Depends on how you define 'alien', as such can be a 'person' or some modern pop-culture concept of the term being a creature, humanoid or otherwise from another world or outer space. A 'celestial' being will be just that, of a celestial nature or status, more spiritual/heavenly in its constitution and character.

We might remind you that the revelators in this account are not 'aliens' as modern pop culture would define such a term (no greys, reptilians or insectoids here), but they are presented as spiritual beings, actual personalities of various orders operating in the universe according to rank and hierarchy. These are beings on the 'inner planes' and so by some miraculous manner transmitted the information using human knowledge sources in some parts, while adding new revelations and terms to enhance or enlarge the greater cosmic revelation of creation's purpose.

One can believe this or not, but to be respectful to the dialogue, let it be of a constructive, progressive nature, if anything but to explore new ideas, realms and dimensions of consciousness.
 

TulipBee

BANNED
Banned
Why not access the primary UB sites and resources to find the answer to your inquiry, or read the book itself ? Wiki is a wonderful resource, but it will direct you to appropriate websites too. If you're really interested in the papers, you can access the freely available information, as we've been discussing thru-out this entire thread. I really tire of the petty haggling and ignorance paraded here by folks who are just here to berate or disparage the material, having no real desire for discussion. Its a waste of time,....considering what I've already invested in using this platform as an exploration of consciousness, making such available for those who want to engage in 'creative dialogue'. A locked mind can never be free to explore new dimensions or be readily available for new revelation. A mind locked in dogma is self-sabotaging. A new freedom in the Spirit is essential to set wings to flight into the unknown to receive new revelations.

At the end of each paper (in the first 3 Parts), the name and/or order of the celestial personality who authored or arranged the paper is listed.

You will find more info. in the Forward, especially the 'Acknowledgement' at the end of the foreward. See Index here.

Concerning Part 4 on the life/ministry of Jesus,...Papers 120 & 121 will inform you about what planetary sources and other resources were used in the production of those accounts. You see how all this information is available? If you're really interested in learning you will educate yourself with the helps provided, then you can actually engage in an informed discussion here, - that's kinda the purpose of the thread. Otherwise, I don't know how to help you, besides what I've been discussing with you so far :idunno:
There comes a time of 'exhaustion' of discussion, and one may be best suited to spend his time elsewhere. While I welcome inter-action here of course, please do respect what it takes to engage in discussion here. - common courtesy and respect.
Not interested cause the celestials may not be good beings
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top