Silent Hunter
Well-known member
Don't ask others to defend YOUR assertion.
toldailytopic: Same-sex marriage: for it, or against it?
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
- Status
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Two people making a lifetime commitment to each other as per the marriage vows addressed 400 times prior. There's nothing in marriage that declares wedded couples have a mandatory requirement to produce children.
Therefore its purpose is not to protect any child that may result from such a union.
Unless of course you know of such a vow that has 'to procreate' amidst 'for better or worse, in sickness and in health, till death us do part' etc...?
Thought not.
:e4e:
lain:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well be fair. Who could possibly be expected to wade through all that without chopping their head off?
lain:
Silent Hunter
Well-known member
One page. He couldn't have read ONE page. That would have been more than enough evidence of chrys' lunacy :chuckle:.
## If I didn't read them, that was because I had not previously posted to the thread. Having an opinion does not necessarily reading 1845 (?) posts. Nor does posting an opinion require a response.
BTW, "moron" will do fine - the "moron" is not strictly a "noob", just an infrequent poster. If you must insult other posters, please, get the facts "straight". TY
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
## If I didn't read them, that was because I had not previously posted to the thread. Having an opinion does not necessarily reading 1845 (?) posts. Nor does posting an opinion require a response.
BTW, "moron" will do fine - the "moron" is not strictly a "noob", just an infrequent poster. If you must insult other posters, please, get the facts "straight". TY
Aaaaaarrrrggghhhh! You've bumped this thread again!
:madmad:
- Status