Trump has not conceded

marke

Well-known member
Lindell shook off one bondage (crack addiction) for which I congratulate and commend him, but the fact is that Lindell still has the hallmarks of addiction and he has transferred them onto Trump, hence his obsessive, irrational and absurd claims about the election and his deluded belief that he has the proof that will overturn it and put Trump back in the White House.
Democrats mock Americans who are offended by voter fraud, claiming they have no proof. The fact is that democrats cannot prove the hundreds of thousands of late-night ballot dumps for Biden were from legitimate voters but democrats claim they do not have to prove the ballots were legitimate. Democrats claim the burden of proof is on those who oppose fraud to prove the ballots were illegitimate. That is hard to prove and may be impossible to prove as long as democrats and leftists refuse to allow investigators to examine the ballots and the machines that counted them.

The fact that voter fraud has become hard to uncover does not mean it did not occur. The fact some fraud is caught and some have gone to prison for fraud proves that people commit voter fraud in spite of democrat claims to the contrary.
 

marke

Well-known member
How long will it take? The election was 10 months ago. We're coming up on a year now, and still no proof of "massive voter fraud."
Democrats have been very successful in blocking investigations into voter fraud, so where do you think evidence of fraud will come from if no investigations are allowed to go forward?
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Democrats: 'We declare that we did not commit voter fraud and it is not our responsibility to prove our innocence but your responsibility to prove our guilt. And, to prevent you from proving our guilt we will "fight like hell" to prevent any deep-dives into the processes and results in any of our democrat-controlled precincts.'
So, still no credible evidence then? Colour me shocked...
 

marke

Well-known member
So, still no credible evidence then? Colour me shocked...
There is evidence of fraud that is being suppressed by leftists "fighting like hell" to keep the truth from coming ut. That is why every demcrat worth his cultist salt is "fighting like hell" to obstruct investigations into fraud.

Citing overriding federal authority under the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the North Carolina Board of Elections (BOE) has denied a North Carolina House Freedom Caucus (HFC) request to examine voting machines.
Chairman of the caucus, Rep. Keith Kidwell (R-Beaufort), told The Epoch Times that although there is a statute that requires state employees to comply with requests for data from the North Carolina General Assembly, Karen Brinson Bell, executive director of the elections board, declined the request to inspect voting equipment used in the November 2020 election in a July 7 letter.
 

marke

Well-known member
Then supply some credible evidence to support the allegations then. Otherwise, just accept that Trump lost and get over it.
Still refuse t believe demcrats have been committing voter fraud all over the country for decades? That is not wise.

Michigan
2021 - Paul Parana, Criminal Conviction, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
2016 - Brandon Hall, Criminal Conviction, Ballot Petition Fraud
2015 - Adam Kane Easlick, Criminal Conviction, False Registrations
2014 - Salim Ahmed, Criminal Conviction, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
2014 - Armani Asad, Criminal Conviction, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
2014 - Russell Mohammed, Criminal Conviction, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
2014 - Edward Pinkney, Criminal Conviction, Ballot Petition Fraud
2014 - Mohammed Abdur Rahman, Criminal Conviction, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
2013 - Dilsa Maria Saddler, Criminal Conviction, Ineligible Voting
2012 - Lorianne O'Brady, Don Yowchuang,…Criminal Conviction, Ballot Petition Fraud
2012 - Jason Bauer and Mike McGuinness, Criminal Conviction, Ballot Petition Fraud
2007 - Edward Pinkney, Criminal Conviction, Buying Votes, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Still refuse t believe demcrats have been committing voter fraud all over the country for decades? That is not wise.

Michigan
2021 - Paul Parana, Criminal Conviction, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
2016 - Brandon Hall, Criminal Conviction, Ballot Petition Fraud
2015 - Adam Kane Easlick, Criminal Conviction, False Registrations
2014 - Salim Ahmed, Criminal Conviction, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
2014 - Armani Asad, Criminal Conviction, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
2014 - Russell Mohammed, Criminal Conviction, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
2014 - Edward Pinkney, Criminal Conviction, Ballot Petition Fraud
2014 - Mohammed Abdur Rahman, Criminal Conviction, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
2013 - Dilsa Maria Saddler, Criminal Conviction, Ineligible Voting
2012 - Lorianne O'Brady, Don Yowchuang,…Criminal Conviction, Ballot Petition Fraud
2012 - Jason Bauer and Mike McGuinness, Criminal Conviction, Ballot Petition Fraud
2007 - Edward Pinkney, Criminal Conviction, Buying Votes, Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
I've never stated that there hasn't ever been cases of political fraud so that's a fail and that applies to all sides. The ridiculous allegations of widespread fraud and election stealing is an all together different animal and is simply laughable.
 

marke

Well-known member
I've never stated that there hasn't ever been cases of political fraud so that's a fail and that applies to all sides. The ridiculous allegations of widespread fraud and election stealing is an all together different animal and is simply laughable.
Democrats claim they have no burden to prove they did not commit fraud, but such arguments do not really excuse them from attempting to disprove clear evidence of fraud, which they commonly do.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican who rebuffed Donald Trump's claims that Georgia's election was marred by voter fraud, said he supports the judge's decision.
In a statement, Raffensperger cited "a longstanding history of election mismanagement" in Fulton County.
"From day one I have encouraged Georgians with legitimate concerns about the election in their counties to pursue those claims through legal avenues," Raffensperger said. "Fulton County has a longstanding history of election mismanagement that has understandably weakened voters' faith in its system. Allowing this audit provides another layer of transparency and citizen engagement."
However, Fulton County Commission Chairman Robb Pitts (D) blasted the decision.
"It is outrageous that Fulton County continues to be a target of those who cannot accept the results from last year's election," Pitts said.

 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Democrats claim they have no burden to prove they did not commit fraud, but such arguments do not really excuse them from attempting to disprove clear evidence of fraud, which they commonly do.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican who rebuffed Donald Trump's claims that Georgia's election was marred by voter fraud, said he supports the judge's decision.
In a statement, Raffensperger cited "a longstanding history of election mismanagement" in Fulton County.
"From day one I have encouraged Georgians with legitimate concerns about the election in their counties to pursue those claims through legal avenues," Raffensperger said. "Fulton County has a longstanding history of election mismanagement that has understandably weakened voters' faith in its system. Allowing this audit provides another layer of transparency and citizen engagement."
However, Fulton County Commission Chairman Robb Pitts (D) blasted the decision.
"It is outrageous that Fulton County continues to be a target of those who cannot accept the results from last year's election," Pitts said.
The burden of proof, as has been outlined to you numerous times before, is on those who make said allegations. If such is non forthcoming as is the case in question, then such can be dismissed. There was ample opportunity for such to be aired in court and lo and behold, nothing.

Tell me something. If you were to be accused of a crime that you hadn't committed then is the onus on you to prove your innocence?
 

marke

Well-known member
The burden of proof, as has been outlined to you numerous times before, is on those who make said allegations. If such is non forthcoming as is the case in question, then such can be dismissed. There was ample opportunity for such to be aired in court and lo and behold, nothing.

Tell me something. If you were to be accused of a crime that you hadn't committed then is the onus on you to prove your innocence?
Nobody should be fooled by crooks who claim they did not commit crimes investigators have not yet gathered enough evidence by which to convict them. And nobody should think crooks will not insist they are innocent of the crimes they committed because the evidence has still not yet been gathered by diligent investigations by honest investigators who are not on the crooks' payroll.
 
Top