Trump has not conceded

[Arthur Brain]

Do you mock the use of microscopes in forensic investigations? That sounds a little back-woodsy.

Not at all. Let them use whatever they wish. A microscope isn't going to magically uncover evidence that isn't there no matter what its setting.

 

[User Name]

No conclusion of fraud has yet been established because investigations into fraud have not yet concluded.

So you admit that there is no evidence to back up your claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election, and that your claim that the election was stolen by the Democrats is in fact an utterly baseless accusation on your part? Got it.

 

[ok doser]

So you admit that there is no evidence to back up your claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election, and that your claim that the election was stolen by the Democrats is in fact an utterly baseless accusation on your part? Got it.

Are you retarded?

Asking for a friend

 

[User Name]

Are you retarded?

Asking for a friend

Are you retarded?

Asking for me

 

[ok doser]

Are you retarded?

Asking for me

After reading the retarded nonsense YOU post, I certainly feel less intelligent.

Can't you try to do better?

 

[User Name]

After reading the retarded nonsense YOU post, I certainly feel less intelligent.

If you feel more intelligent after reading @marke's posts, then yes, you are retarded.

 

[ok doser]

If you feel more intelligent after reading @marke's posts, then yes, you are retarded.

Yeah, I didn't say that, retard

 

[Arthur Brain]

So you admit that there is no evidence to back up your claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election, and that your claim that the election was stolen by the Democrats is in fact an utterly baseless accusation on your part? Got it.

Doubtful that he'll admit it but then, some folk still think Trump will be reinaugurated some time in August somehow so hey...

(They're not exactly playing with a full deck)

 

[User Name]

Doubtful that he'll admit it but then, some folk still think Trump will be reinaugurated some time in August somehow so hey...

@marke insists he knows for a fact that the Democrats stole the 2020 presidential election but he neglects to mention that no credible evidence of widespread fraud has been put forward to begin with. You couldn't make it up.

In another thread, @marke admitted that Trump is delusional to say that he will be reinstated to the presidency, but it isn't a far stretch from that to admitting that Trump is also delusional for claiming that he won the 2020 election by a landslide, and yet that is somehow a reach too far for him. It isn't. If Trump is delusional now for suggesting that he can be reinstated, then in all likelihood Trump was also delusional just a few months back when he claimed, sans evidence, that he won the election in a landslide. Trump didn't just suddenly become delusional over the course of a few months. Delusional is as delusional does.

 

[Arthur Brain]

@marke insists he knows for a fact that the Democrats stole the 2020 presidential election but he neglects to mention that no credible evidence of widespread fraud has been put forward to begin with. You couldn't make it up.

In another thread, @marke admitted that Trump is delusional to say that he will be reinstated to the presidency, but it isn't a far stretch from that to admitting that Trump is also delusional for claiming that he won the 2020 election by a landslide, and yet that is somehow a reach too far for him. It isn't. If Trump is delusional now for suggesting that he can be reinstated, then in all likelihood Trump was also delusional just a few months back when he claimed, sans evidence, that he won the election in a landslide. Trump didn't just suddenly become delusional over the course of a few months. Delusional is as delusional does.

Well, to be fair, you'd have to make such evidence up because none of the tangible sort exists...

Trump knew fine well that he'd lost or was likely to lose before he made that bonkers victory speech only a few hours after the initial results were coming in.

 

[marke]

Not at all. Let them use whatever they wish. A microscope isn't going to magically uncover evidence that isn't there no matter what its setting.

If a microscope will not uncover evidence then why do democrats demand microscopes not be used in the investigation?

 

[marke]

So you admit that there is no evidence to back up your claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election, and that your claim that the election was stolen by the Democrats is in fact an utterly baseless accusation on your part? Got it.

Here is more evidence that democrats have not yet successfully refuted:

‘We Need an Audit:’ Georgia Lawyer on Latest Fulton County Updates

www.theepochtimes.com

“We have people that saw, during the hand recount, many of these ballots had never been folded. So there was no crease. They should have been in an envelope. That’s a dead giveaway. And then these people saw that these ovals outside of the candidates’ names have been perfectly filled in with a white space in the middle and that’s impossible,” Cheeley said during the election special.

 

[marke]

Doubtful that he'll admit it but then, some folk still think Trump will be reinaugurated some time in August somehow so hey...

(They're not exactly playing with a full deck)

I believe the investigations will never yield convictions because widespread voter fraud over several decades has rarely been prosecuted and convictions are rare. The allegations of voter fraud are not disproved. Democrats just apply every method and influence they can to silence the investigations and shut them down.

I don't believe Trump will ever be US President again.

 

[User Name]

Here is more evidence that democrats have not yet successfully refuted:

‘We Need an Audit:’ Georgia Lawyer on Latest Fulton County Updates

www.theepochtimes.com

"The ballot review stemming from this lawsuit will not change the election outcome."

Judge rules Fulton County absentee ballots to be unsealed, reviewed after fraud claims

Fulton County, which includes Atlanta, has been the source of conspiracy theories, largely promoted by former President Donald Trump and his supporters.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[User Name]

Here is more evidence that democrats have not yet successfully refuted:

It has been refuted...by Republicans:

The Georgia secretary of state's office has audited the state's election results three times. None of those audits turned up evidence of widespread fraud.

"Our law enforcement officers and secretary of state's office spent literally thousands of hours examining ballots in Fulton County and other counties trying to track these kinds of claims down, and so far we've seen nothing give any merit to it," Gabriel Sterling, the Republican chief operating officer and chief financial officer for the Georgia secretary of state's office, said in a recent interview with CNN.

Fact check: No evidence of fraud in Georgia election results

Three audits found no evidence of malfeasance affecting Georgia's election results, and a review mentioned in an online claim hasn't even started yet.

www.usatoday.com

 

[marke]

"The ballot review stemming from this lawsuit will not change the election outcome."

Judge rules Fulton County absentee ballots to be unsealed, reviewed after fraud claims

Fulton County, which includes Atlanta, has been the source of conspiracy theories, largely promoted by former President Donald Trump and his supporters.

www.nbcnews.com

No, one investigation into one precinct may show irrefutable evidence of fraud but proof of fraud in just one precinct, though involving possibly thousands of fraudulent votes, will not be enough to demonstrate the election was stolen. For that, every precinct with obvious evidence of errors that look deliberate would have to be investigated. I think Biden is safe, but the democrats may never again be able to restore confidence in US elections handled by untrustworthy partisan democrats.

 

[marke]

It has been refuted...by Republicans:

The Georgia secretary of state's office has audited the state's election results three times. None of those audits turned up evidence of widespread fraud.

"Our law enforcement officers and secretary of state's office spent literally thousands of hours examining ballots in Fulton County and other counties trying to track these kinds of claims down, and so far we've seen nothing give any merit to it," Gabriel Sterling, the Republican chief operating officer and chief financial officer for the Georgia secretary of state's office, said in a recent interview with CNN.

Fact check: No evidence of fraud in Georgia election results

Three audits found no evidence of malfeasance affecting Georgia's election results, and a review mentioned in an online claim hasn't even started yet.

www.usatoday.com

The incompetents who supervised the flawed elections in their precincts investigated themselves and found no flaws. Go figger. Of course the incompetent and untrustworthy Georgia officials blocking real investigations into their questionable election results will find themselves not guilty of fraud.

 

[Arthur Brain]

No, one investigation into one precinct may show irrefutable evidence of fraud but proof of fraud in just one precinct, though involving possibly thousands of fraudulent votes, will not be enough to demonstrate the election was stolen. For that, every precinct with obvious evidence of errors that look deliberate would have to be investigated. I think Biden is safe, but the democrats may never again be able to restore confidence in US elections handled by untrustworthy partisan democrats.

The Arizona audit was hardly handled by partisan democrats, it was 'run' by cyber ninjas.

 

[Arthur Brain]

If a microscope will not uncover evidence then why do democrats demand microscopes not be used in the investigation?

Arizona Republicans hunt for bamboo-laced China ballots in 2020 ‘audit’ effort

Among the conspiracy theories driving the exercise in Maricopa county is one that suggests 40,000 ballots were flown in from Asia

www.theguardian.com

 

[User Name]

Bill Barr helped obstruct the investigations of the government murders at Ruby Ridge, so he has a history of questionable judgment and behavior.

So, you're saying that Trump was an idiot for appointing Bill Barr to be his attorney general then? Got it.

Too bad Trump didn't consult with you before he gave Barr the job.