Trump sez: Transgenders B gone!

[ok doser]

Innocence or guilt is like that.
I really don't like the way we intimidate people into taking a plea in our current system.

agreed

 

[ok doser]

It wasn't DNA evidence it was blood type evidence.

the PGM stuff was protein markers - not specifically DNA, but linked to it

 

[ok doser]

That ain't corroboration and the Judge should have declared a mistrial the second that came out of the Prosecutors mouth.
That's what they do, they keep multiplying percentages of unique things to a person until they say "Fat Bald Middle Aged White dudes with Goatees are only .00002% of the global population and fool is one of them!"

there's gotta be more than 1440 Fat Bald Middle Aged White dudes with Goatees :idunno:

 

[ok doser]

It wasn't DNA evidence it was blood type evidence.

the blood type evidence by itself was essentially meaningless

 

[ok doser]

Oh that's a thing alright, that's the thing we got now.

i'd like to believe we don't

but i'm afraid i'll have to close my eyes and put my fingers in my ears

 

[fool]

the PGM stuff was protein markers - not specifically DNA, but linked to it

AND

someone with blood type A and PGM 2+1+. This typing was consistent with both the victim and Atkins.

 

[fool]

there's gotta be more than 1440 Fat Bald Middle Aged White dudes with Goatees :idunno:

You probably have to add "Ate toast for breakfast and listens to NPR" to get the .00002% number but no worries, they'll just keep multiplying things until they get a really small number.

 

[ok doser]

AND

i'd be very interested in ensuring that there was no cross-contamination - i assume that was done, because that's what we did, but perhaps not in this case


did Atkins have a lawyer?

 

[SabathMoon]

Intersex people or human life exists. It is not just a few chromosomes which contain errors.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Hermaphrodite is the third possibility. If this hasn't been mentioned.

and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good.So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. - Genesis 1:18,27 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis1:18,27&version=NKJV

Seems like "intersex" isn't natural. Which is why I didn't include it.

 

[quip]

and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good.So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. - Genesis 1:18,27 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis1:18,27&version=NKJV

Seems like "intersex" isn't natural. Which is why I didn't include it.

"His image" seems to simultaneously reflect both male and female attributes. So......? :idunno:

 

[JudgeRightly]

"His image" seems to simultaneously reflect both male and female attributes. So......? :idunno:

So therefore... Something. :AMR:

:blabla:

Strong's h6754 - Lexical: צֶ֫לֶם - Transliteration: tselem - Part of Speech: Noun Masculine - Phonetic Spelling: tseh'-lem - Definition: images. - Origin: From an unused root meaning to shade; a phantom, i.e. (figuratively) illusion, resemblance; hence, a representative figure, especially an idol. - Usage: image, vain shew. - Translated as (count): his images (2), images (2), in the image (2), the images (2), according to his image (1), and images (1), and the images (1), in a vain show (1), in His own image (1), in Our image (1), self images (1), their image (1), your images (1).

God created an image for Himself, and then fashioned man in that image.

He then created woman from man, who was created in the image of God's created image.

VVVV :readthis: VVVV

God made MAN "male and female."

Not "male and female and everywhere in between."

Jesus affirmed the former in Mark:

[JESUS]But from the beginning of the creation, God ‘made them male and female.’[/JESUS] - Mark 10:6 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark10:6&version=NKJV

 

[quip]

So therefore...

God created an image for Himself, and then fashioned man in that image.

He then created woman from man, who was created in the image of God's created image.

VVVV :readthis: VVVV

God made MAN "male and female."

Not "male and female and everywhere in between."

Jesus affirmed the former in Mark:

[JESUS]But from the beginning of the creation, God ‘made them male and female.’[/JESUS] - Mark 10:6 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark10:6&version=NKJV

Yes. "In His image" one at a time :duh:
You've designated...nothing regarding God's image. :idunno:

 

[WizardofOz]

i'd be very interested in ensuring that there was no cross-contamination - i assume that was done, because that's what we did, but perhaps not in this case


did Atkins have a lawyer?

Should he have?

 

[ok doser]

Sure looks like it

 

[WizardofOz]

Sure looks like it

A lawyer could have helped an innocent man falsely accused of a serious crime?

 

[ok doser]

In the corrupt system that was accusing him?

Of course

 

[WizardofOz]

In the corrupt system that was accusing him?

Of course

:chuckle: It’s not much but this may be the kindest I’ve heard you refer to the profession.

 

[ok doser]

If I was held captive by ISIS, tortured, threatened with execution and had the opportunity to escape with the assistance of a brutal psychopath, a man with no socially redeemable qualities- I would take that opportunity

Similarly, lawyers

 

[musterion]

Know why snakes won't bite lawyers?