White Lives Matter

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
"Make America Hate Again"

What a stupid slogan, by people who have done all the hating :rolleyes:

All the businesses they've sued, people's reputations they've ruined, people they've protested against- even murdered: these are all just normal people getting on with their lives, whom liberals all imagined hate in.

How can you call yourself a Christian and say that it is wrong for a person to refuse gratifying a homosexual marriage? How do you defend a bunch of people blocking highways and sniping out officers, when they kill whites a double rate than whites to them? How do you justify a college student being expelled for alleged rape, when he was found innocent in court?

Liberalism is the practice of defending the indefensible, all in the name of these bogus agendas. It's obvious where the hatred resides.
 

Tambora

Get your armor ready!
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Never mind, by the way, that racial distinctions have no place in a Believer's perspective.
When have I ever said that racial distinctions have a place in a believers perspective, Danoh??????????????
A believer is a believer no matter what past cultural attractions they hold to.
You are barking up the wrong tree, again.
 

Tambora

Get your armor ready!
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Because these days, you are a vile, filthy, hatefilled, racist, bigot with unchecked privileged without saying a word. All you need to do is BE white, thats it.
I know.
It's orchestrated propaganda to try and make whites feel guilty if they accomplished anything.

Sorry, but white folks accomplished a lot that I am impressed with.
And I don't feel guilty at all about that.
Not one iota.

It's the same way they go after the rich.
If you have more, you must be evil and uncaring and racist and hate filled.
Has the makings of a whole lot of BALONEY sandwiches!
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
"Make America Hate Again"

What a stupid slogan, by people who have done all the hating :rolleyes:

All the businesses they've sued, people's reputations they've ruined, people they've protested against- even murdered: these are all just normal people getting on with their lives, whom liberals all imagined hate in.

How can you call yourself a Christian and say that it is wrong for a person to refuse gratifying a homosexual marriage? How do you defend a bunch of people blocking highways and sniping out officers, when they kill whites a double rate than whites to them? How do you justify a college student being expelled for alleged rape, when he was found innocent in court?

Liberalism is the practice of defending the indefensible, all in the name of these bogus agendas. It's obvious where the hatred resides.

Loony Libs are "Anti-Love" at its finest.
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
I know.
It's orchestrated propaganda to try and make whites feel guilty if they accomplished anything.

Sorry, but white folks accomplished a lot that I am impressed with.
And I don't feel guilty at all about that.
Not one iota.

It's the same way they go after the rich.
If you have more, you must be evil and uncaring and racist and hate filled.
Has the makings of a whole lot of BALONEY sandwiches!

:thumb: thats how i feel, and it makes us even nastier that they cant push their own false guilt on us.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
You wont be answering her question period because there isnt anything to answer in it, nothing about it does as you lied and said. Its really sad to see you sell off your integrity.

it's been apparent for a loooong time that anna has no integrity
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
"Make America Hate Again"
I prefer, "Make America Grate Again!" Because there's just nothing more irritating than listening to the privileged whine about their victimization.

What a stupid slogan, by people who have done all the hating
Have you ever even been near a Trump rally? :plain:

All the businesses they've sued, people's reputations they've ruined, people they've protested against- even murdered: these are all just normal people getting on with their lives, whom liberals all imagined hate in.
Another narrative sans supportive fact brought to you by the king of that sort of thing.

Here's what you do if you want to malign a group. You take general accusations of unconscionable, even illegal activity and you stir it in a pot as though every or most who are in some way aligned with the group are participants. Stir on medium heat and serve when the pot boils over.

How can you call yourself a Christian and say that it is wrong for a person to refuse gratifying a homosexual marriage?
How can you speak English and torture it like that? Kidding. You have to, because there's no way to say what you did using conventional grammar that doesn't make the point look as absurd as the slap dash. You can't "gratify" a marriage. You can participate, you can support, you can oppose, you can revile, but you can't "gratify".

You also can hold your objection and publicly, but you can't discriminate. And what you're really after is the right to do that, isn't it?

How do you defend a bunch of people blocking highways and sniping out officers, when they kill whites a double rate than whites to them?
You conflate too many disparate elements. Civil protest can impede and aggravate. It may be illegal and require action, but it shouldn't be confused or lumped with violent criminal activity. And rates of interracial violence are about that, unusually high this past year, though both combined account for only 12% of all homicides, so race as an integral part of the equation isn't controlling by any means.

Else, supra. The movement for accountability brought on by BLM isn't about and shouldn't be confused or conflated with thugs who ride the margins any more than we should consider all (fill in the blank) fans of a given team by what some use a championship to do under cover of night.

How do you justify a college student being expelled for alleged rape, when he was found innocent in court?
I wouldn't try without specifics and link to them.

Liberalism is the practice of defending the indefensible
No, all sorts of liberal ideas are completely defensible. Liberalism is a philosophy. As with any, some run to extremes and most don't. When we (by which I mean you and those similarly inclined) attempt to paint the rule from the margin all we (by which I mean you, again) do is marginalize the value of our (you again) voice.

It's obvious where the hatred resides.
Oh, I'm thinking that's true enough.
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
Sure, we should all just hate any white people that shows any pride in their heritage and what those before them accomplished.

"And those are really awful videos. Not just the vile racist content"​
I bet you didn't even watch the first video because if you did you would have heard it tell that taking pride in one's heritage should be allowed for all races to express if they want to, but shouldn't ever limit white people from doing the same.

"weepy music"​
I thought the music was quite pleasant.
"practice their Classical Greek poses"​
Oh the horrors!!!!

An American Indian once said: "Black is beautiful, tan is grand, but, white's still the color of the BIG boss man."
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
As is Black racism, it's alive and well here in America too.
We've seen many instances of blacks putting down whites and even calling for white extermination.
Why don't we call that black supremacist racism?

But show the other side of that coin and it's labeled white supremacist racism??????
Why?

Political Correction controlled our Nation for the past eight years. Hopefully, things will change, now that we have a REAL President!
 

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
Have you ever even been near a Trump rally? :plain:

They were angry, and rightfully so.

Liberals like to test people and then call their reaction some fundamental discrimination.

How can you speak English and torture it like that? Kidding. You have to, because there's no way to say what you did using conventional grammar that doesn't make the point look as absurd as the slap dash. You can't "gratify" a marriage. You can participate, you can support, you can oppose, you can revile, but you can't "gratify".

Being a Christian, and making a cake with 'Adam and Steve' drawn on it with two male figurines on top- I mean, what is 'gratifying' if not making an art out of something :rolleyes:

You also can hold your objection and publicly, but you can't discriminate. And what you're really after is the right to do that, isn't it?

Else, supra. The movement for accountability brought on by BLM isn't about and shouldn't be confused or conflated with thugs who ride the margins any more than we should consider all (fill in the blank) fans of a given team by what some use a championship to do under cover of night.

The fact is that a white person has no business supporting BLM.
I don't understand how much clearer the point could be, especially when you put beside it the fact that a black person is exponentially more likely to be killed by another black person than by anyone else.

BLM could only be legitimate if it criticized their own people, and left us out of it. I think the best thing that happened with black people is Malcolm X- they really should have gravitated to him rather than King. Because then they would see things for how they are rather than becoming what they have.

Them going Democrat was them going back to their slave masters- and that is why they aren't functioning like they should. It doesn't take a genius to figure it out, 'liberal philosophy' is just worldly fatalism on a stick.
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
They were angry, and rightfully so.

Liberals like to test people and then call their reaction some fundamental discrimination.
That's an interesting generalization in need of particulars. Paint the picture, let's look at it.

Being a Christian, and making a cake with 'Adam and Steve' drawn on it with two male figurines on top- I mean, what is 'gratifying' if not making an art out of something :rolleyes:
If you sell cakes and you sell cakes where you write whatever the person wants, short of pornography, on them, then that's your business, not the choice of pronouns.

The problem with that objection, the notion that you're somehow participating in an immoral act by virtue of providing a cake, is that I'm going to bet my bottom dollar there's no questionaire by the cake maker regarding whether or not the couple who wants it are being married in a Christian church (my understanding being that so far it's been a Christian objection). It's as hypocritical and under thought as the objection to gay marriage was from our community when atheists, Hindus and every other heterosexual couple who wanted to marry were married without moral objection from anyone.

You also can hold your objection and publicly, but you can't discriminate. And what you're really after is the right to do that, isn't it?
That was me. Don't do the Stripe thing on me. :nono:

The fact is that a white person has no business supporting BLM.
It's not a fact, it's an opinion offered as one. The fact is that anyone who agrees with the premise of racial injustice within the criminal justice system and wants it addressed can join in. Or simply respond as individuals in agreement.

I don't understand how much clearer the point could be, especially when you put beside it the fact that a black person is exponentially more likely to be killed by another black person than by anyone else.
It's like suggesting that because more people are killed by speeding than because they don't fasten their seat belts we should ignore the latter or that seat belt use isn't a legitimate concern.

BLM could only be legitimate if it criticized their own people, and left us out of it.
Well, no. First, the movement was aimed at disparate treatment of blacks by police and the criminal justice system. If you're arguing there are bigger fish that need frying, sure. But it's not an either/or. It should be a both approach, but addressing either remains a good.

I think the best thing that happened with black people is Malcolm X- they really should have gravitated to him rather than King. Because then they would see things for how they are rather than becoming what they have.
Well, Malcom was moving toward King before the Nation of Islam killed him for it.

Them going Democrat was them going back to their slave master
No, not really, which is why Southerners abandoned the Democratic party and a red sea swept over the former Confederate states.

It doesn't take a genius to figure it out, 'liberal philosophy' is just worldly fatalism on a stick.
It isn't, but you have to wade into it. At a distance things can appear to be and simplicity can be confused with truth.
 
Top