Pastors who welcome unrepentant sexual offenders into Christian communion teach error.
LOL, what lies?
I approve of the Catholic Church's teachings on SSB, and so do you.
Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4
- Thread starter aCultureWarrior
- Start date
- Status
In the first three WHMBR! threads I designated one post as "the most important post" of that thread. I did so because it's theme was of the upmost importance, i.e. something that should be remembered.
In Part 1, Dr. Archie P. Jones' 'Civil Government: the Neglected Ministry' got the nod because it showed just how important a righteous government and it's rulers are.
http://vftonline.org/VFTfiles/thesi...HE NEGLECTED MINISTRY, by Archie P_ Jones.htm
In Part 2, Dr. Paul Cameron's 'What Causes Homosexual Desires and Can It Be Changed?' took the #1 spot because it's important for people to know that no one is born with same sex desires and that those desires can be changed.
https://www.biblebelievers.com/Cameron3.html
A TOLer's heartbreaking testimony of being molested as a child and the inner rage that grew within him was the most important post of Part 3.
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-3&p=4064685&viewfull=1#post4064685
Childhood should be a time of innocence and happiness, and children should not have to live in a society that embraces sexual perversion.
No one post has been designated the most important post of Part 4, because the obvious has been shown throughout the thread:
The secular humanist/LGBTQ movement has heavily infiltrated the Christian Church as well as the conservative movement (whose basic ideology comes from Judeo-Christian doctrine).
With the "Gay Christian Movement" being seen by many as a legitimate form of Christianity and sexual degenerates like Donald Trump and Steven Crowder being called "conservative", I've done my best to expose those frauds and will continue to do so in upcoming threads.
People often ask me why instead of voting 3rd Party I didn't vote for Donald Trump as he would be the 'lesser of two evils' vs a Hillary Clinton Presidency. Besides showing that Trump has been a long time LGBTQ activist prior to his Presidency and continues to do so to this day, my answer to them is:
Donald Trump has done to the once conservative Republican Party what a Democrat President could never do:
Turned the once God fearing/pro traditional family values Republican Party into a rainbow flag waving Party of moral degenerates.
https://i.imgflip.com/12wxff.jpg
In Part 1, Dr. Archie P. Jones' 'Civil Government: the Neglected Ministry' got the nod because it showed just how important a righteous government and it's rulers are.
http://vftonline.org/VFTfiles/thesi...HE NEGLECTED MINISTRY, by Archie P_ Jones.htm
In Part 2, Dr. Paul Cameron's 'What Causes Homosexual Desires and Can It Be Changed?' took the #1 spot because it's important for people to know that no one is born with same sex desires and that those desires can be changed.
https://www.biblebelievers.com/Cameron3.html
A TOLer's heartbreaking testimony of being molested as a child and the inner rage that grew within him was the most important post of Part 3.
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-3&p=4064685&viewfull=1#post4064685
Childhood should be a time of innocence and happiness, and children should not have to live in a society that embraces sexual perversion.
No one post has been designated the most important post of Part 4, because the obvious has been shown throughout the thread:
The secular humanist/LGBTQ movement has heavily infiltrated the Christian Church as well as the conservative movement (whose basic ideology comes from Judeo-Christian doctrine).
With the "Gay Christian Movement" being seen by many as a legitimate form of Christianity and sexual degenerates like Donald Trump and Steven Crowder being called "conservative", I've done my best to expose those frauds and will continue to do so in upcoming threads.
People often ask me why instead of voting 3rd Party I didn't vote for Donald Trump as he would be the 'lesser of two evils' vs a Hillary Clinton Presidency. Besides showing that Trump has been a long time LGBTQ activist prior to his Presidency and continues to do so to this day, my answer to them is:
Donald Trump has done to the once conservative Republican Party what a Democrat President could never do:
Turned the once God fearing/pro traditional family values Republican Party into a rainbow flag waving Party of moral degenerates.
https://i.imgflip.com/12wxff.jpg
With TOL'er Art Brain continuing to be devastatingly upset over Phil Robertson's 2014 comment in his GQ magazine interview about a woman's v****a being more desirable than a man's a**s:
I've made Art Brain a promise (and I expect the participants of this thread to hold me to that promise)
I promise not to talk about the health hazards of using the body part for sex that was intended to expel human waste in Part 5 more than...
5 or 6 dozen times.
Does that sound fair to the LGBTQ'ers following this thread?
Spoiler
I've made Art Brain a promise (and I expect the participants of this thread to hold me to that promise)
I promise not to talk about the health hazards of using the body part for sex that was intended to expel human waste in Part 5 more than...
5 or 6 dozen times.
Does that sound fair to the LGBTQ'ers following this thread?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
With TOL'er Art Brain continuing to be devastatingly upset over Phil Robertson's 2014 comment in his GQ magazine interview about a woman's v****a being more desirable than a man's a**s:
Spoiler
I've made Art Brain a promise (and I expect the participants of this thread to hold me to that promise)
I promise not to talk about the health hazards of using the body part for sex that was intended to expel human waste in Part 5 more than...
5 or 6 dozen times.
Does that sound fair to the LGBTQ'ers following this thread?
Oh, just get out of the darned closet already you silly little crank. The only one obsessed about Robertson's comments on body parts is you you nut. Once again, you do not have an army of followers, you have a very average view to blog ratio and you need to acknowledge your own homosexuality and stop spamming up bandwidth with your ongoing, projected lunacy.
Get a life man!
:doh:
Paul Cameron? :crackup:
The irony of this is that those who engage in homosexual behavior disproportionately smoke cigarettes.
https://scottthong.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/smokers_homosexuals.jpg?w=450
https://scottthong.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/smokers_homosexuals.jpg?w=450
The irony of this is that those who engage in homosexual behavior disproportionately smoke cigarettes.
https://scottthong.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/smokers_homosexuals.jpg?w=450
An fine example of conservative "logic": To justify hate, discrimination, violence, even child abuse take two unrelated things, lie about both of them.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
The irony of this is that those who engage in homosexual behavior disproportionately smoke cigarettes.
Here's some interesting statistics from a reliable source (if it's from a LGBTQ source, it must be reliable, right ...Dante?)
The LGBT Community is Disproportionately Impacted by Tobacco
Members of the LGBT community smoke at a far greater rate than that of the general population, although estimates vary widely. In one 2004 California Study, lesbian women were 70% more likely to smoke than other women, and gay men were more than 50% more likely to smoke than other men. More recent research suggests this number may be even higher. The LGBT National Tobacco Control Network estimates that the LGBT community is 50% to 200% more likely than others to be addicted to tobacco. 1, 2
LGBT adolescents also smoke at an alarming rate, in one national study 47 of females and 36.7 of males reporting same-sex attraction or behavior smoked. In comparison, only 29% of the rest of young people in the study smoked. 3
Negative Health Impacts of Smoking are Clear
Tobacco is the number one cause of mortality in this country. 4The American Cancer Society estimates that over 30,000 LGBT people die each year of tobacco-related diseases. 5This is a conservative estimate, because it presumes we smoke at the same rate as the rest of the population.
Adults who smoke lose an average of 13 to 14 years of their lives. 6
In the United States , about 90% of lung cancer deaths in men and almost 80% of lung cancer deaths in women are due to smoking. 7
Read more: http://thedccenter.org/facts_smoking.html
As I recall, Art Brain said that he's a cigarette smoker, and my bestest friend in the whoooole wide world, Aaron, said that he smokes at social events (bars, weddings...fill in the blanks).
How about you ...Dante, do you do things that will cut your lifespan down by at least 13 to 14 years, and I'm not only talking about tobacco use.
https://hellodoktor.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/smoking.jpg
The irony of this is that those who engage in homosexual behavior disproportionately smoke cigarettes.
Here's some interesting statistics from a reliable source (if it's from a LGBTQ source, it must be reliable, right ...Dante?)
The LGBT Community is Disproportionately Impacted by Tobacco
Members of the LGBT community smoke at a far greater rate than that of the general population, although estimates vary widely. In one 2004 California Study, lesbian women were 70% more likely to smoke than other women, and gay men were more than 50% more likely to smoke than other men. More recent research suggests this number may be even higher. The LGBT National Tobacco Control Network estimates that the LGBT community is 50% to 200% more likely than others to be addicted to tobacco. 1, 2
LGBT adolescents also smoke at an alarming rate, in one national study 47 of females and 36.7 of males reporting same-sex attraction or behavior smoked. In comparison, only 29% of the rest of young people in the study smoked. 3
Negative Health Impacts of Smoking are Clear
Tobacco is the number one cause of mortality in this country. 4The American Cancer Society estimates that over 30,000 LGBT people die each year of tobacco-related diseases. 5This is a conservative estimate, because it presumes we smoke at the same rate as the rest of the population.
Adults who smoke lose an average of 13 to 14 years of their lives. 6
In the United States , about 90% of lung cancer deaths in men and almost 80% of lung cancer deaths in women are due to smoking. 7
Read more: http://thedccenter.org/facts_smoking.html
As I recall, Art Brain said that he's a cigarette smoker, and my bestest friend in the whoooole wide world, Aaron, said that he smokes at social events (bars, weddings...fill in the blanks).
How about you ...Dante, do you do things that will cut your lifespan down by at least 13 to 14 years, and I'm not only talking about tobacco use.
https://hellodoktor.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/smoking.jpg
Last edited:
i was going to ask if it was a more reliable source that Paul Cameron...but then EVERYTHING is more reliable than Paul Cameron
What is Steve Bannon up to?
I've talked little about Bannon, so let's go over some of his credentials:
1) Considered the founder of the godless Alt Right movement.
2) Worked with and took over LGBTQ ally Andrew Breitbart's* news organization after Breitbart died.
*Andrew Breitbart Joins GOProud Advisory Council
https://shadowproof.com/2011/01/19/have-at-it-andrew-breitbart-joins-goproud-advisory-council/
3. Made openly homosexual/defender of pedophilia Milo Yiannopolous into a star.
MILO on Channel 4: ‘I Am A Gay Jew And Steve Bannon Made Me Into A Star’
http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/11/18/milo-channel-4-gay-jew-steve-bannon-made-star/
4. Became Chief Strategist for LGBTQ flag waver President Donald Trump.
Yet Bannon has been a strong supporter of Judge Roy Moore in the Alabama U.S. Senate race and while making documentaries for a living, wrote and directed what appears to be a very pro Phil Robertson film entitled:
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon...zMzMjY1Nzc@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,673,1000_AL_.jpg
So what's Steve Bannon up to? Surely he's not trying to blend the godless Libertarian leaning/Alt Right movement in with those who stand for biblical values, i.e. he's surely not using true conservatives to help him redefine what true conservatism is?
Steve Bannon concerns me.
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/mt/2016/08/steve_bannon/lead_960.jpg?1472160740
What are you up to Steve?
I've talked little about Bannon, so let's go over some of his credentials:
1) Considered the founder of the godless Alt Right movement.
2) Worked with and took over LGBTQ ally Andrew Breitbart's* news organization after Breitbart died.
*Andrew Breitbart Joins GOProud Advisory Council
https://shadowproof.com/2011/01/19/have-at-it-andrew-breitbart-joins-goproud-advisory-council/
3. Made openly homosexual/defender of pedophilia Milo Yiannopolous into a star.
MILO on Channel 4: ‘I Am A Gay Jew And Steve Bannon Made Me Into A Star’
http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/11/18/milo-channel-4-gay-jew-steve-bannon-made-star/
4. Became Chief Strategist for LGBTQ flag waver President Donald Trump.
Yet Bannon has been a strong supporter of Judge Roy Moore in the Alabama U.S. Senate race and while making documentaries for a living, wrote and directed what appears to be a very pro Phil Robertson film entitled:
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon...zMzMjY1Nzc@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,673,1000_AL_.jpg
So what's Steve Bannon up to? Surely he's not trying to blend the godless Libertarian leaning/Alt Right movement in with those who stand for biblical values, i.e. he's surely not using true conservatives to help him redefine what true conservatism is?
Steve Bannon concerns me.
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/mt/2016/08/steve_bannon/lead_960.jpg?1472160740
What are you up to Steve?
https://memegenerator.net/img/insta...mart-enough-and-doggone-it-people-like-me.jpg
Evidently not Al...
Franken quits amid sexual misconduct allegations
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...onduct-allegations/ar-BBGkhuA?ocid=spartandhp
Next up: Why are pseudo conservatives all excited about the Trump announcement of the US recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moving the US Embassy there?
It's not like Israel embraces Judeo doctrine anymore.
There are alot mildly Jewish-- I think, in Israel. Jewish unitarians have a problem with the idolatry of the trinity doctrine. As I do also.
https://memegenerator.net/img/insta...mart-enough-and-doggone-it-people-like-me.jpg
Evidently not Al...
Franken quits amid sexual misconduct allegations
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...onduct-allegations/ar-BBGkhuA?ocid=spartandhp
Next up: Why are pseudo conservatives all excited about the Trump announcement of the US recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moving the US Embassy there?
It's not like Israel embraces Judeo doctrine anymore.
Jerusalem to host Israel’s main gay pride parade...
https://www.timesofisrael.com/jerusalem-to-host-israels-main-gay-pride-parade-report/
Next years parade is going to need a Grand Marshal:
https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/58177a15150000d804530d10.jpeg?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale
Benjamin Netanyahu voices support for gay rights on Knesset LGBT Day
http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Netanyahu-voices-support-for-gay-rights-on-Knesset-LGBT-Day-445867
So much for Netanyahu being a 'conservative'.
http://www.truthrevolt.org/sites/de.../image/articles/lgbt_israel.jpg?itok=d5ax8Xpk
http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Netanyahu-voices-support-for-gay-rights-on-Knesset-LGBT-Day-445867
So much for Netanyahu being a 'conservative'.
http://www.truthrevolt.org/sites/de.../image/articles/lgbt_israel.jpg?itok=d5ax8Xpk
Wow, you might be the last righteous man on earth. :thumb:
An excellent article by Bryan Fischer entitled:
Prediction: Al Franken will NOT resign – here's why
Dec. 8, 217
Contrary to popular perception, Al Franken did not resign yesterday.
He only announced his intent to resign on a future date uncertain. Here's what he said:
[T]oday I am announcing that in the coming weeks I will be resigning as member of the United States Senate. I, of all people, am aware that there is some irony in the fact that I am leaving while a man who has bragged on tape about his history of ... sexual assault sits in the Oval Office and a man who has repeatedly preyed on young girls campaigns for the Senate with the full support of his party.
In fact, not only did Al Franken not resign yesterday, it is my prediction that he will never resign. He will not resign until Roy Moore does, and since there is no way Roy Moore is gonna do that, there's no way Al Franken is gonna do that either.
This is the chief takeaway from Franken's apology-less Senate speech yesterday, a takeaway that most people have missed because they continually underestimate the capacity of swamp dwellers to deceive while appearing to tell the truth.
All Franken said he would do is resign "in the coming weeks." That is a gloriously indefinite time frame. Franken can cram as much of the future into that phrase as he wants.
Immediately after Franken mentioned his resignation at some unknown, unspecified point in the future, he spoke of the "irony" that a president who has a "history...of sexual assault" sits serenely in the Oval Office while Roy Moore, a man who has "repeatedly preyed on young girls," is still on the ballot in Alabama.
(My position on Roy Moore has been unmistakably clear from day one: there is not one single shred of actual evidence that he did anything he's been accused of. The stories of his accusers completely unravel on closer examination. Moore rightfully should still be enjoying the presumption of innocence, and it is an absolute travesty that the members of his own party have pitched him off the boat with zero evidence of guilt. Shame on them. Shame. Shame. Shame.)
Franken's point will be, look, there's no way I should resign when two notorious sexual predators like Trump and Moore are alive and well in the Republican Party. In fact, they should resign, not me, since unlike them, I have always been a "champion of women."
We likely won't hear from Franken again until December 13, the day after the results of the Alabama senate race are known. What we will hear from Franken that day will be something like this: "I have offered, in good faith, to tender my resignation as a member of the United States Senate. Roy Moore, as a serial sexual predator, must do the same. In fact, I propose, as a gesture of nobility on my part, that Mr. Moore and I depart the Senate together. I will be happy to resign the same day Roy Moore does. Until then, I ain't going anywhere."
Read more: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/171208
It's been proven that Al Franken and Donald Trump are disgusting sexual deviants; unlike Roy Moore who has been subjected to one of the most vicious smear campaigns since Joseph McCarthy and J Edgar Hoover.
Prediction: Al Franken will NOT resign – here's why
Dec. 8, 217
Contrary to popular perception, Al Franken did not resign yesterday.
He only announced his intent to resign on a future date uncertain. Here's what he said:
[T]oday I am announcing that in the coming weeks I will be resigning as member of the United States Senate. I, of all people, am aware that there is some irony in the fact that I am leaving while a man who has bragged on tape about his history of ... sexual assault sits in the Oval Office and a man who has repeatedly preyed on young girls campaigns for the Senate with the full support of his party.
In fact, not only did Al Franken not resign yesterday, it is my prediction that he will never resign. He will not resign until Roy Moore does, and since there is no way Roy Moore is gonna do that, there's no way Al Franken is gonna do that either.
This is the chief takeaway from Franken's apology-less Senate speech yesterday, a takeaway that most people have missed because they continually underestimate the capacity of swamp dwellers to deceive while appearing to tell the truth.
All Franken said he would do is resign "in the coming weeks." That is a gloriously indefinite time frame. Franken can cram as much of the future into that phrase as he wants.
Immediately after Franken mentioned his resignation at some unknown, unspecified point in the future, he spoke of the "irony" that a president who has a "history...of sexual assault" sits serenely in the Oval Office while Roy Moore, a man who has "repeatedly preyed on young girls," is still on the ballot in Alabama.
(My position on Roy Moore has been unmistakably clear from day one: there is not one single shred of actual evidence that he did anything he's been accused of. The stories of his accusers completely unravel on closer examination. Moore rightfully should still be enjoying the presumption of innocence, and it is an absolute travesty that the members of his own party have pitched him off the boat with zero evidence of guilt. Shame on them. Shame. Shame. Shame.)
Franken's point will be, look, there's no way I should resign when two notorious sexual predators like Trump and Moore are alive and well in the Republican Party. In fact, they should resign, not me, since unlike them, I have always been a "champion of women."
We likely won't hear from Franken again until December 13, the day after the results of the Alabama senate race are known. What we will hear from Franken that day will be something like this: "I have offered, in good faith, to tender my resignation as a member of the United States Senate. Roy Moore, as a serial sexual predator, must do the same. In fact, I propose, as a gesture of nobility on my part, that Mr. Moore and I depart the Senate together. I will be happy to resign the same day Roy Moore does. Until then, I ain't going anywhere."
Read more: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/171208
It's been proven that Al Franken and Donald Trump are disgusting sexual deviants; unlike Roy Moore who has been subjected to one of the most vicious smear campaigns since Joseph McCarthy and J Edgar Hoover.
There's still a few of us left Aaron. Have you ever thought about seeking the truth? It'll set you free ya know.
And now a word from one of Aaron's many sock puppets...
Last edited:
Bump.
Originally Posted by Nihilo
Pastors who welcome unrepentant sexual offenders into Christian communion teach error.
LOL, what lies?
I approve of the Catholic Church's teachings on SSB, and so do you.
Which would you like me to address?
1). How would a pastor know if someone taking communion is unrepentant and for that matter a sexual offender? Was he wearing Priest attire?
2). http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=5072485&viewfull=1#post5072485
3). Liberals in the Catholic Church, including the current Pope, have been and currently are allies to the LGBTQ movement.
Pastors who welcome unrepentant sexual offenders into Christian communion teach error.
LOL, what lies?
I approve of the Catholic Church's teachings on SSB, and so do you.
Which would you like me to address?
1). How would a pastor know if someone taking communion is unrepentant and for that matter a sexual offender? Was he wearing Priest attire?
2). http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=5072485&viewfull=1#post5072485
3). Liberals in the Catholic Church, including the current Pope, have been and currently are allies to the LGBTQ movement.
With SCOTUS currently reviewing the Jack Phillips/ Masterpiece Bakeshop case, it all comes down to this question:
What takes priority: Religious freedom or lawful behavior?
Supreme Court Hears Colorado Bakery Case Highlighting Clash Between US Laws
Dec. 5, 2017
Do U.S. laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation infringe on religious freedom and freedom of expression?
The question lies at the heart of Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, one of the closely watched cases before the U.S. Supreme Court this year.
Justices are hearing oral arguments in the case on Tuesday, more than two years after the high court handed down a landmark ruling legalizing same-sex marriage.
The case involves a Colorado baker, Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, who refused to design a custom cake for a gay couple's wedding in 2012...
Stephen Wermiel teaches constitutional law at the American University Washington College of Law and talked to VOA about the case...
Is this case about gay rights or the First Amendment?
Yes. The case really pits two values against one another. (The petitioner) basically says this is about his First Amendment rights and not being forced to take positions that he disagrees with, either expressively or religiously.
The state and the parties supporting the state (say) he's entitled to object to same-sex marriage all he wants but he doesn't have a right to discriminate, that this case isn't about his freedom, it's about the discrimination laws of the United States being upheld.
Read more: https://www.voanews.com/a/supreme-c...e-sex-marriage-religious-freedom/4148819.html
Would this be an issue if someone came into Phillips' bakeshop and wanted to order a cake embracing bestiality?
Would this be an issue if someone came into Phillips' bakeshop and wanted to order a cake embracing incestuous relationships?
No, because those things aren't legal.
Since homosexual behavior and now faux marriage are both legal and hence have protection under the law, I see no way that Phillips and others like him can win their cases.
https://gdb.voanews.com/20FCA7EF-6CBE-45A1-A283-A02C5E673B40_cx0_cy10_cw0_w1023_r1_s.jpg
Religious freedom: Yet another reason "Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized!"
What takes priority: Religious freedom or lawful behavior?
Supreme Court Hears Colorado Bakery Case Highlighting Clash Between US Laws
Dec. 5, 2017
Do U.S. laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation infringe on religious freedom and freedom of expression?
The question lies at the heart of Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, one of the closely watched cases before the U.S. Supreme Court this year.
Justices are hearing oral arguments in the case on Tuesday, more than two years after the high court handed down a landmark ruling legalizing same-sex marriage.
The case involves a Colorado baker, Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, who refused to design a custom cake for a gay couple's wedding in 2012...
Stephen Wermiel teaches constitutional law at the American University Washington College of Law and talked to VOA about the case...
Is this case about gay rights or the First Amendment?
Yes. The case really pits two values against one another. (The petitioner) basically says this is about his First Amendment rights and not being forced to take positions that he disagrees with, either expressively or religiously.
The state and the parties supporting the state (say) he's entitled to object to same-sex marriage all he wants but he doesn't have a right to discriminate, that this case isn't about his freedom, it's about the discrimination laws of the United States being upheld.
Read more: https://www.voanews.com/a/supreme-c...e-sex-marriage-religious-freedom/4148819.html
Would this be an issue if someone came into Phillips' bakeshop and wanted to order a cake embracing bestiality?
Would this be an issue if someone came into Phillips' bakeshop and wanted to order a cake embracing incestuous relationships?
No, because those things aren't legal.
Since homosexual behavior and now faux marriage are both legal and hence have protection under the law, I see no way that Phillips and others like him can win their cases.
https://gdb.voanews.com/20FCA7EF-6CBE-45A1-A283-A02C5E673B40_cx0_cy10_cw0_w1023_r1_s.jpg
Religious freedom: Yet another reason "Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized!"
- Status