Ask Mr. Religion

I reported Bob Enyart for blasphemy. Do you think he will get banned? ROTFL!

Thanks, will take a look.

Been hanging out on Facebook. There are even crazier people there!

Thank you for the link to the other thread.

Oh yes. Don't confuse these with being owned them however. I believe Marvel has even had them run their comics off of their presses for local area distribution. So I had seen these connections before.

Interesting connection between Marvel and Deseret. Have any links? I was not able to find the connection here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deseret_Book

AMR, thank you for your thoughtful note in my Visitor Messages. It's always good to hear from you. Wishing you all the best in your studies. ~ James

Take a look at my answer on, "Does God Know?"

You're welcome, and forgive me for not saying so more often.

God Bless you, AMR.

Thank you for the formal objection to dragging my family into his nonsense. I suspect it's because repeated attempts to similarly disparage Southerners went without notice. As with the pedophile remarks it's plain that his obsession with me has overwhelmed him and that he's nearly desperate to get some emotionally driven response from me.

I had him on ignore for a time. I probably shouldn't have removed him, but people kept reposting his bits and you know me...that's why I'm a lawyer. :chuckle: Maybe I need to simply broaden the ignore to those he could use for the purpose of getting around it, like CC or Eeset and the like. :think:

At any rate, thanks again. :cheers:

Thanks. That is much more clear and allows me to mull it over without having a conscious objection.

I don't know what to say . . . this confuses me because I am cut off from RTI . . .??? But I thank you for your generosity, here at TOL.

There was an article in the Harvard Business Review that reminded me of a complaint I frequently had with Trad of late and zip habitually. According to James Pennebaker's research into language, more specifically studies on usage, "A person who’s lying tends to use “we” more or use sentences without a first-person pronoun at all." So when you see, habitually, that taking place just before pronouncements on character it tells you something.

You'd need his eyes to see it...and then you couldn't see anything much for all the blood and wood. :e4e: Not kind of me though, simply accurate.

Appreciated the effort, but unsurprisingly all it got you was: http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3959897&postcount=73

Cut myself off. I'm confused. If Calvinists mangled the primary and Armenians the rest...what the devil is Tot reading? oly: I may have to ask her.

I am in that group and posted twice, but no one seems to be awake

I take IOUs ...

I am not seeing the disconnect you see...
Thanks. Rep owed. I thought it was inferred then meant to get back to it once I realized some weren't seeing it but life got in the way. That was well put, as per, and precisely it. Rep owed.

Appreciate the consideration. I'll mull it, though we may be at a slight impasse. Time will tell. Thanks again though. :cheers: