Search results

Repeating something you have failed to established does not make it established. On further review, I realized that Jefferson's wife died before Hemmings children were born so adulterer is really the wrong word. I honestly can't say what is the right word as I don't know the exact relationship...

I answered this already if they are talking about child rape with intent then they are NOT talking responsibly and they are criminal conspirators. As for talking about the subject in general, have you turned yourself into the police yet?

You have done nothing but waste time on this discussion, you have spent probably 90% of the CORE discussion about Jennings talking about Harry Hay, a rabbit hole that has produced little useful relevance to the CORE discussion because it has provided no evidence that Jennings admiration of Hay...

Except it is not a direct link. It is guilt by association. You have failed to show that what inspired him has anything to do with Hay's supposed connections to NAMBLA or that he even know about them. I am inspired by Thomas Jefferson for his contributions to the founding of our country and...

Did aCultureWarrior make a stupid snide comment he knows is stupid? I do believe he did. The classic yelling fire example is older than dirt and everyone who has ever intelligently discussed speech knows what it means. Turning an illustrative example into a silly snide comment is just stupid...

So even when both you and one of your sources admit there is no link or proof of Jennings and NAMBLA, even though I have repeatedly pointed out that six degrees of separation arguments are not really proof of anything, you just go back to the same well. If Hay's NAMBLA links have failed to...

This question has already been addressed. If they are discussing a crime even if they do not take action on it they are responsible for the outcome of their speech. I gave the old example for yelling fire in a crowded theater and you yourself raised one of the mechanisms of that...

Ahh, I see. Yes, they do have a right to express a message but with rights comes responsibilities, if they advocate a crime which is what raping someone would be, they are subject to the consequences of that. The classic fire in a crowded theater scenario. You are not actually going to find a...

And...? NAMBLA's public position and what they would like to pass as is known. We also know that they are largely a failure at it and a joke to most of the world.

I must have too because we haven't. And....? There is nothing here that supports your position other than the same now getting a little-tired reference to Hay.

Best I can tell you are here to stroke your own ego and bigotry. If you really were out to alert people, you would not be hiding this on an obscure message board. As I pointed out to you before. You are not producing anything original or new here, all your material is just stuff you scrape...

You haven't posted anything conclusive so far other than six degrees of separation and third-hand conjecture (gossip). Since generally, you should have started with your best arguments, I would say there is nothing to sweat here.

And.... You have yet to show that Hay was a pedophile or that Jennings was aware of it if that was the case. Conjecture by third parties is not proof. You haven't shown that Hay was a member or that he supported child rape. I'm not ruling it out given what you have so far but you still...

So more hearsay, gossip, and the same six degrees of separation. Thanks for confirming what I posted earlier. One would think that if Jennings was involved with NAMBLA they would know about it? And once again, making schools safe for kids, how dare he! Hearsay, gossip, conjecture, six...

Since I never defended NAMBLA and have said repeatedly that pedophiles should be prosecuted to the maximum extent of the law, this is not a change in my position. The FBI has my wholehearted support in this effort. Having read Part 2 and only finding the same things you have already covered...

So the next chapter is going to be some random speculation about Jennings from Bob Hamer on one or more talk shows. Based on what I've read in articles titled NAMBLA-gate part two, it will be more about his association with Hay. The article I found was largely about Hay and even though it was...

A good man doing good work.

I'm afraid your opinion of who is or is not a homosexual or a homosexual hero has no standing outside your own mind. And as I point out there is a considerable number of Christians who disagree. I know you have your answer, they are not true Scotsmen. Sadly, just as you are not an arbitrator...

Nothing but doubt, you haven't provided anything to support this accusation. And once again, how quickly CW is to attack the person who he was portrayed as a victim just a few posts before.

No, I pointed out how you measure freedom of speech but why to let that stop you making a fool of yourself to toss out another snide comment. No need to hold your tongue, free speech applies to all speech even yours. I'm actually finding it quite interesting how your true colors have been...