ECT If MAD is False What Does Hebrews 6:4-6 Mean for Us?

[Tattooed Theist]

Dispensationalism's point exactly.

But what is directed to all, is directed to all.
Which is where you've derailed.

 

[steko]

But what is directed to all, is directed to all.
Which is where you've derailed.

Nope.

Dispensationalism holds to that same principle.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Matthew 15:24 (KJV)

Was the LORD Jesus SENT TO GENTILES?

Easy question, easy answer.

Accept it.

 

[Tattooed Theist]

Nope.

Yup. All means all, my friend.
Jesus didn't have a speech impediment, He was quite clear.

One word answers mean the conversation is over, so have a great day. Truly.

 

[Tattooed Theist]

Matthew 15:24 (KJV)

Was the LORD Jesus SENT TO GENTILES?

Easy question, easy answer.

Accept it.

In chapter 15 He is just connecting His presence with God’s purpose in OT history.

Galatians 4:4-5

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

In chapter 15 He is just connecting His presence with God’s purpose in OT history.

Galatians 4:4-5

Rationalization, because you don't like what he said.


"Jesus didn't have a speech impediment, He was quite clear."

 

[Tattooed Theist]

Rationalization, because you don't like what he said.


"Jesus didn't have a speech impediment, He was quite clear."

Context. Context. Context.
:shut:

It will be the death of your theological understanding.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Context. Context. Context.
:shut:

It will be the death of your theological understanding.

Was the LORD sent to Gentiles?
Simple question.

 

[steko]

Context. Context. Context.
:shut:

Another one of the hermeneutical principles that dispensationalists affirm.

 

[steko]

One word answers mean the conversation is over,

Nope.

 

[andyc]

Matthew 15:24 (KJV)

Was the LORD Jesus SENT TO GENTILES?

Easy question, easy answer.

Accept it.

The guy's right, you have to put this into context.
His earthly ministry was supposed to be to Israel, although he also ministered to Samaritans and gentles. However, his DBR was the primary reason why he was sent, and this was for the world (John 3:16).

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

The guy's right, you have to put this into context.
His earthly ministry was supposed to be to Israel, although he also ministered to Samaritans and gentles. However, his DBR was the primary reason why he was sent, and this was for the world (John 3:16).

:chuckle:

was he sent to Gentiles?

 

[andyc]

:chuckle:

was he sent to Gentiles?

The guy's right, you have to put this into context.
His earthly ministry was supposed to be to Israel, although he also ministered to Samaritans and gentles. However, his DBR was the primary reason why he was sent, and this was for the world (John 3:16).

 

[andyc]

Can madists show from scripture who wasn't baptized?

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

The idea all through the Old Testament is to get Israel saved first, then Israel was to bring the Gentiles to God.

The 4 gospels continue this.

Very simple.

 

[Tattooed Theist]

Another one of the hermeneutical principles that dispensationalists affirm.

Do MAD not adhere to a logical, proper reading of an ancient historic text?

That wouldn't be a principle, that would be unintelligible.

 

[musterion]

Do MAD adhere to a logical, proper reading of an ancient historic text?

Indeed, MAD do so adhere.

 

[Tattooed Theist]

That's a major exegetical malfunction...

 

[steko]

Do MAD not adhere to a logical, proper reading of an ancient historic text?

Yes, MAD do adhere....

That wouldn't be a principle, that would be unintelligible.

I can't make any logical sense of that text, though I endeavored to properly read it several times.

 

[steko]

Indeed, MAD do so adhere.

There's an echo in here. :noid: