Trump sez: Transgenders B gone!

[fool]

XXY prevalence is estimated at 1:500

that's 0.2%

small percentage, large when extrapolated to the total population = 15,200,000 worldwide

651,400 in the states

So, average high school will have two individuals with XXY.

 

[ok doser]

So, average high school will have two individuals with XXY.

up here we have school districts with graduating classes of fifteen


that's less than two hundred K-12

 

[fool]

You're out for dinner at a nice restaurant. Your elderly mother excuses herself and enters the restroom marked XX. Shortly after, she's followed by this:

Spoiler

do you react?




or, shortly after she's followed by this:

Spoiler

do you react?

No.

 

[fool]

up here we have school districts with graduating classes of fifteen


that's less than two hundred K-12

Yikes.

 

[ok doser]

No.

replace "elderly mother" with "twelve year old daughter"


do you react to either?

 

[fool]

replace "elderly mother" with "twelve year old daughter"


do you react to either?

No.

 

[ok doser]

ok, I'd react to both wrt the second person, regardless of their chromosomal makeup

 

[fool]

ok, I'd react to both wrt the second person, regardless of their chromosomal makeup

How?

 

[ok doser]

prolly follow "him" to the door and stand outside and listen


maybe talk to the management

 

[fool]

prolly follow "him" to the door and stand outside and listen


maybe talk to the management

But why not rush in?
If you think there's a danger then don't you need to address it now?

 

[ok doser]

But why not rush in?
If you think there's a danger then don't you need to address it now?

that's the problem - in today's society, this ("men" using women's restrooms) has become normalized, so the reaction my dad (and virtually any other decent man) would have had thirty years ago - to drag the pervert out of the women's restroom and bodily throw him out into the parking lot - is considered to be the "wrong" response. Instead, those of us who are concerned for the safety of our loved ones are expected to wait until the alarm is raised.

 

[JudgeRightly]

OK, now that we've solidified that we go back to the diagram.

Let's make it crystal clear to everyone what the expectation is with the rest room.

We put an XX on one door and an XY on the other door.

Simple enough yes?

Here comes the XXY, looks to me like they can use either rest room.

XX present? (checks chromosomes) YES. Enters rest room.

XY present? (checks chromosomes) YES. Enters rest room.

There's the point, and it's not even a point it's an observation of reality.

Objections? Anyone?

Whoa whoa whoa.

What happened to the "diagram" (Punnett Square) you were going to go back to?

You're jumping to your own conclusion, which isn't supported by the diagram.

That's not how Punnett squares work.

You put one chromosome (or trait) (X or Y) per row/column, not two or three. Like this:

A mother with XX and a Father with XY have a child. There is a 50% chance that the child will be XX, a little baby girl, and a 50% chance that the child will be XY, a little baby boy. (In reality, the percentage is slightly higher that it will be a boy than a girl.

If you want to do parents with more than 2 Chromosomes (which is an abnormality) you can do larger Punnett Squares, but the results will still be children with XX or XY (as far as Punnett squares are concerned).

 

[fool]

that's the problem - in today's society, this ("men" using women's restrooms) has become normalizedd, so the reaction my dad (and virtually any other man) would have had thirty years ago - to drag the pervert out of the women's restroom and bodily throw him out into the parking lot - is considered to be the "wrong" response. Instead, those of us who are concerned for the safety of our loved ones are expected to wait until the alarm is raised.

Thirty years ago when my cousin came out as gay his parents threw him out and disowned him.
Times change.

But back to the bathroom. What if you see someone and you're really not sure if it's a man or a woman? We've all seen these. Are you alarmed?

 

[ok doser]

Thirty years ago when my cousin came out as gay his parents threw him out and disowned him.
Times change.

But back to the bathroom. What if you see someone and you're really not sure if it's a man or a woman? We've all seen these. Are you alarmed?

i'd probably be more alert - it would depend


and in either case, if they came out and my elderly mother/twelve year old daughter didn't, I'd probably knock on the door and call in to make sure they were ok

 

[fool]

Whoa whoa whoa.

Whoaing.

What happened to the "diagram" (Punnett Square) you were going to go back to?

We're back.

You're jumping to your own conclusion, which isn't supported by the diagram.

I'm pointing out that the diagram is incomplete.

That's not how Punnett squares work.

They need to get their act together.

You put one chromosome (or trait) (X or Y) per row/column, not two or three. Like this:

A mother with XX and a Father with XY have a child. There is a 50% chance that the child will be XX, a little baby girl, and a 50% chance that the child will be XY, a little baby boy. (In reality, the percentage is slightly higher that it will be a boy than a girl.

Not correct. As Doser showed us in post #78;

XXY prevalence is estimated at 1:500

that's 0.2%

small percentage, large when extrapolated to the total population = 15,200,000 worldwide

651,400 in the states

If you want to do parents with more than 2 Chromosomes (which is an abnormality) you can do larger Punnett Squares, but the results will still be children with XX or XY (as far as Punnett squares are concerned).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klinefelter_syndrome#Variations

Klinefelter syndrome usually occurs randomly.[3] An older mother may have a slightly increased risk of a child with KS.[3] The condition is not typically inherited from one's parents.[3] The underlying mechanisms involves at least one extra X chromosome in addition to a Y chromosome such that the total chromosome number is 47 or more rather than the usual 46.[9] KS is diagnosed by the genetic test known as a karyotype.[4]

 

[fool]

i'd probably be more alert - it would depend


and in either case, if they came out and my elderly mother/twelve year old daughter didn't, I'd probably knock on the door and call in to make sure they were ok

In the case of the 12 year old you could just text them or check their Instagram feed.

 

[fool]

So, to circle back to this;

so what I'm getting here is that they're people with errors in their genetic code and they're not normal

i think both jr and fool would agree on that much

I agree and if I add them up and inflate it a little I'm going to say .5% including all the other survivable combinations.
Like;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_syndrome

to me, the question becomes "how does society deal with the non-normal?"

And there my friend, is the heart of the question.
That really is the only question that matters and is the root of everything.
"How do we treat each other?"

to many (not saying you, fool) the insistence is that they be viewed as variants of normal and accommodated in ways that the majority finds problematic

They need to be viewed as human beings who didn't want or ask for any of this.

because of feelings, etc

Because of abnormalities.

 

[JudgeRightly]

So, to circle back to this;


I agree and if I add them up and inflate it a little I'm going to say .5% including all the other survivable combinations.
Like;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_syndrome



And there my friend, is the heart of the question.
That really is the only question that matters and is the root of everything.
"How do we treat each other?"



They need to be viewed as human beings

As far as I can tell, no one has said otherwise.

who didn't want or ask for any of this.

What about those who simply "self-identify" as transgender, but are genetically "normal?" Pretty sure they did ask for this.

Because of abnormalities.

Which brings us back to this question from Glass.

I don't see why that should have any bearing on your response to my question. Should only individuals with genetic anomalies (ie, XXY) be considered "transgender"?

Let's get to it now. Your conversation with JR can continue, unaffected. Should only the individuals with genetic anomalies (ie, XXY) be considered "transgender"?

In addition to that, then what about all the people who claim to be "transgender" but genetically are XX (female) or XY (male)?

 

[The Horn]

Look . Some humans have been having sex with members of the same gender from the the very beginning of the human race abut 200,000 years ago . And they always will .
Trying to legislate homosexuality out of existence is both stupid and destructive .
Homosexuality is found in hundreds of animal species . But humans are the only species which hates others for engaging in homosexual sex . Every day, children are born who will grow up to be gay .
Get over it and please mind your own business !

 

[JudgeRightly]

Look . Some humans have been having sex with members of the same gender from the the very beginning of the human race abut 200,000 years ago.

Humans weren't around 10,000 years ago, let alone 200,000.

And they always will.

Wishful thinking.

Trying to legislate homosexuality out of existence is both stupid and destructive.

Homosexuality has been illegal for the past 3500 years. Only within the last 50 or so has it been legalized.

Homosexuality is found in hundreds of animal species.

So is eating one's own young. Yet humans don't because we're NOT ANIMALS.

We are creatures made in God's image and likeness. No other creature is.

But humans are the only species which hates others for engaging in homosexual sex.

Because it's immoral, filthy, and disgusting, not to mention dangerous, and an abomination to God.

Every day, children are born who will grow up to be gay.

Correlation does not equal causation.

By the way, how many of those who "will grow up to be" (your words, not mine, implying that they're not born homosexual (because they're truly not) (see, even a broken clock is right twice a day...)) homosexual become that way because a relative molested or raped them when they were young?

Get over it and please mind your own business !

No, we will not "get over it." Homosexuality is a threat to normal society. We don't have to tolerate something that threatens society.