You should be the last one complaining here.
:up: to the freedom of religious expression..yes?
Perhaps she is so...so whatever, that she believes it and missed the fact that it is merely an icon of mockery.
If that is the case, she has every right to be as strange as she is BUT probably shouldn't be driving.
OTOH, while religious freedom is accepted, and while free-speech is as well, it doesn't mean you can do whatever you like in your driver's photos. Even Muslim women have to uncover. It depends on the state, but some don't even allow hats, which this certainly is.
Nobody will remember her tomorrow and I found it not even passingly interesting. TOL members interest in it, is a bit more interesting to me, so...
Bingo! :devil:
That "look" is the very point of her demonstration, exemplifying the stupidities of religion.
That, however, is not religious freedom, it is commentary on another's religion and thus merely free-speech and NOT exercise of a sincere religion.
Some atheists need to learn that mockery of religion, isn't 'freedom of religion.' It is rather an exercise of free-speech and has nothing to do with 'their' religion or lack-there-of. I realize 'why' they don't get that, and they certainly have a right to ignorance, but I don't think I have to listen to it. If she is merely doing mockery, no dice. If she is sincerely duped as she says she is, fine. One is freedom of speech, the other is freedom of religion, but cannot impede picture identity by police and other authorities. She may have to get a plastic one for airports.
