what did this kid do that was stupid?
He never had a chance to explain, the cop wasn't interested in why or if the kid had no license, Totally the cop's fault.
what did this kid do that was stupid?
Yes. Your posts certainly indicate as much.
what did this kid do that was stupid?
argue with a cop when the cop was being professional and reasonable and asking for his license and registration
that was pretty stupid
Argue with a cop -> summary execution without trial.
that's not the way it played out
did you watch the video?
1. argue with a cop, get arrested
2. resist arrest, get subdued with non-lethal weapon
3. continue resisting when non-lethal weapon fails, get subdued with lethal weapon
He never had a chance to explain, the cop wasn't interested in why or if the kid had no license, Totally the cop's fault.
Whose life was at risk here?
Was the boy a lethal risk to the public if he wasn't taken in immediately?
both parties
who knows? :idunno:
more importantly, how would you expect the officer to know?
what the officer did know was that the driver was acting abnormal
why?
because he had a gun under the seat?
because he have a kidnapped child in the trunk that he planned to molest?
impossible to know or to rule out without investigating further
why did this officer stop this boy from the gitgo?
illegal in michigan to flash your brights at oncoming traffic
both parties
who knows? :idunno:
more importantly, how would you expect the officer to know?
what the officer did know was that the driver was acting abnormally
why?
because he had a gun under the seat?
because he had a kidnapped child in the trunk that he planned to molest?
because he had a big bag of pot or coke or heroin in the car?
impossible to know or to rule out without investigating further
So it is OK to kill someone as long as you haven't yet definitively proved they aren't dangerous?
That is a minor injury.
Head cuts always look worse than they are.
Hardly evidence of legal danger of the unarmed youth.
Not worth 'subdual by execution'.
Hmmmmm......the officer's headlights were on high, nearly blinding other drivers.
It was illegal to indicate to the officer that his headlights were possibly deadly in that they could blind drivers, causing accidents?
In addition, wasn't this officer already aware that these headlights were causing problems BEFORE this?
what was the cop sposed to do at that point?
let the kid go?
Tug your forelock, bow your head, and say "yessir" when your superiors walk by.
No, respect isn't taught, it is earned. Authority that has not earned respect doesn't deserve respect.
He must have had enough information, such as the car's plate, to identify the kid later and have him picked up later. That's what happens in civilised societies which don't want to spend young lives freely.
I see this paper claiming that, speaking as if its first person, this has not been established. In any paper that gets anywhere near it, it is alleged by the parents lawyer and then what is alleged that is that the headlights in his new patrol car is misaligned low beams that were very bright.
yes, in Michigan its illegal.
Since people often flash others to warn of officers on the road to get them to slow down and interfere with police, there is no way on earth to show this.
At any rate, its illegal to refuse to provide officers with license and registration if you are the driver. Whether or not you think you did anything wrong, this has been upheld repeatedly.