17 Year Old Shot And Killed By Cop

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Argue with a cop -> summary execution without trial.

that's not the way it played out

did you watch the video?

1. argue with a cop, get arrested
2. resist arrest, get subdued with non-lethal weapon
3. continue resisting when non-lethal weapon fails, get subdued with lethal weapon
 

gcthomas

New member
that's not the way it played out

did you watch the video?

1. argue with a cop, get arrested
2. resist arrest, get subdued with non-lethal weapon
3. continue resisting when non-lethal weapon fails, get subdued with lethal weapon

Whose life was at risk here? Was the boy a lethal risk to the public if he wasn't taken in immediately?
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Whose life was at risk here?

both parties

Was the boy a lethal risk to the public if he wasn't taken in immediately?

who knows? :idunno:

more importantly, how would you expect the officer to know?

what the officer did know was that the driver was acting abnormally

why?

because he had a gun under the seat?

because he had a kidnapped child in the trunk that he planned to molest?

because he had a big bag of pot or coke or heroin in the car?

impossible to know or to rule out without investigating further
 

brinny

New member
both parties



who knows? :idunno:

more importantly, how would you expect the officer to know?

what the officer did know was that the driver was acting abnormal

why?

because he had a gun under the seat?

because he have a kidnapped child in the trunk that he planned to molest?

impossible to know or to rule out without investigating further

why did this officer stop this boy from the gitgo?
 

brinny

New member
illegal in michigan to flash your brights at oncoming traffic

Hmmmmm......the officer's headlights were on high, nearly blinding other drivers.

It was illegal to indicate to the officer that his headlights were possibly deadly in that they could blind drivers, causing accidents?

In addition, wasn't this officer already aware that these headlights were causing problems BEFORE this?

What would this 17 yr old's options been in this situation?

Call 911 on the officer after getting his tag #?
 

gcthomas

New member
both parties



who knows? :idunno:

more importantly, how would you expect the officer to know?

what the officer did know was that the driver was acting abnormally

why?

because he had a gun under the seat?

because he had a kidnapped child in the trunk that he planned to molest?

because he had a big bag of pot or coke or heroin in the car?

impossible to know or to rule out without investigating further

So it is OK to kill someone as long as you haven't yet definitively proved they aren't dangerous?

Is that how you want cops to behave? Kill first, just in case?
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
So it is OK to kill someone as long as you haven't yet definitively proved they aren't dangerous?

i think the kid had proven that he was dangerous:

635701645832783601-B9317769699Z.1-20150617180724-000-G66B40OO8.1-0.png
 

gcthomas

New member
That is a minor injury. Head cuts always look worse than they are. Hardly evidence of legal danger of the unarmed youth. Not worth 'subdual by execution'.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
That is a minor injury.

debatable, but so what?

it's evidence that the driver was dangerous

Head cuts always look worse than they are.

tell you what - lemmee do that to your face and let's see your reaction

Hardly evidence of legal danger of the unarmed youth.

"legal danger" :freak:

he assaulted a police officer

around here, we're taught not to do that

because, you know - it's against the law

Not worth 'subdual by execution'.

as i said, the first response was the non-lethal weapon

it failed

what was the cop sposed to do at that point?

let the kid go?
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
Hmmmmm......the officer's headlights were on high, nearly blinding other drivers.

I see this paper claiming that, speaking as if its first person, this has not been established. In any paper that gets anywhere near it, it is alleged by the parents lawyer and then what is alleged that is that the headlights in his new patrol car is misaligned low beams that were very bright.

It was illegal to indicate to the officer that his headlights were possibly deadly in that they could blind drivers, causing accidents?

yes, in Michigan its illegal.

In addition, wasn't this officer already aware that these headlights were causing problems BEFORE this?

Since people often flash others to warn of officers on the road to get them to slow down and interfere with police, there is no way on earth to show this.

At any rate, its illegal to refuse to provide officers with license and registration if you are the driver. Whether or not you think you did anything wrong, this has been upheld repeatedly.
 

gcthomas

New member
what was the cop sposed to do at that point?

let the kid go?

He must have had enough information, such as the car's plate, to identify the kid later and have him picked up later. That's what happens in civilised societies which don't want to spend young lives freely.
 

glorydaz

Well-known member
Tug your forelock, bow your head, and say "yessir" when your superiors walk by.

No, respect isn't taught, it is earned. Authority that has not earned respect doesn't deserve respect.

Don't tell me....let me guess. You're a liberal.

Do you even bow your head to God?

Were you the decider of whether your parents deserved your respect, and what age were you allowed to make that judgment. Two, Twelve, or Fifteen?

Teachers.....did they lose your respect when they made you turn in your homework?


When men do what is right in their own eyes instead of what is right, we have the very mess we see around us today. Good job, LIBS. You get the credit.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
He must have had enough information, such as the car's plate, to identify the kid later and have him picked up later. That's what happens in civilised societies which don't want to spend young lives freely.

ahh, i see


so you think the scenario should have played out like this:

1. cop pulls over stoned kid
2. stoned kid refuses to cooperate with routine traffic stop
3. cop attempts to arrest kid
4. kid resists arrest, fights with cop
5. cop deploys non-lethal weapon, unsuccessfully, while stoned kid whales on his face
6. cop helps kid up, escorts him back to his car and let's him go even though he's not yet seen any id



Spoiler
Surprise_youre_a_retard.jpg
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
I see this paper claiming that, speaking as if its first person, this has not been established. In any paper that gets anywhere near it, it is alleged by the parents lawyer and then what is alleged that is that the headlights in his new patrol car is misaligned low beams that were very bright.



yes, in Michigan its illegal.



Since people often flash others to warn of officers on the road to get them to slow down and interfere with police, there is no way on earth to show this.

At any rate, its illegal to refuse to provide officers with license and registration if you are the driver. Whether or not you think you did anything wrong, this has been upheld repeatedly.


and so, frost was justified in pulling guilford over, and was justified in attempting to arrest him

and he was justified in subduing him when he fought
 
Top