I have always opposed their usurpation of territories.
What Chair said. So are you going to quote us your objections to when Russia walked into Crimea? And are you going to go back to Europe and leave America to the Indians whose territory you 'usurped'? And where are your objections to the Australians who 'usurped' Australia from the Aborigines, New Zealand from the Maoris?
I'll bet you are one of those persons who were suckered into believing we became re-involved in Iraq and subsequently Syria to fight Isis. What a farce. You think the movers and shakers care about a few dozen or even a few thousands of executions by a radical group of Muslims? Buy a clue. Follow the money trail. We are there because they knew this Golan Heights oil was soon to be in play.
You didn't listen, did you? The amount of oil in Golan is tiny. Get a life. And you didn't answer my question did you? That's because you are an anti-semitic coward. I can tell you why you never complained that Israel was farming grapes on the Golan. It's because you hate Israel and you will jump onto any bandwagon that you can invent gossip about to smear the name of that little country. If you were less hypocritical about it, you would have complained about the grapes. But you didn't. Why? Because you would have been laughed at. But the oil is not any different in principle.
Here's another thing: you say that Israel is taking advantage of the war in Syria. But any country, including your own, would take advantage of a war in a neighbouring country. And indeed, their government would be criticised if they didn't. But when Israel does it, the most natural and normal of actions, it is suddenly the most evil thing in the world. This is because you are anti-semitic. This is what anti-semitism looks like.
Just because the UN is anti-Israel doesn't make it right. I would be against pretty much anything the UN wanted and vice versa. When people are fighting defensive wars and win, and take territory, they keep it. It's always been that way. Why should they give it back?
I was going to quote a few UN statistics in my last post, but decided to keep it simple. Did you know for example that in the UNHRC, half of all the motions are anti Israel? It's a Muslim run organisation, make no mistake. UNESCO is the same. I don't know why we pay our membership to this garbage of an organisation. It only survives because of the security council. If America pulled out, or if it was decided to scrap the major powers veto system, the whole thing would collapse.
"usurpation" is an odd word to describe what happened to The Golan Heights. Please tell us how that area happened to become controlled by Israel, and how that is "usurpation".
Eeset applies standards to Israel that she doesn't apply to any other country. This, as I am sure you know, is what anti-semitism really looks like.