NAACP leader outed as white
- Thread starter GFR7
- Start date
shagster01
New member
We don't need white so-called race groups or black so-called race groups. We are one race--the human race (Ac 17:26).
Too bad you don't have a biblical worldview. "Too bad." :chz4brnz: ~ Seth Brundle, The Fly
No one who believes the bible can be a racist.oly:
"Homo sapiens. A primate...People are animals...God rules out the creationist doctrine...ome apes are more special than others..."~ Barbarian
The bible called one race "the chosen people."
GFR7
New member
Excellent article from the Federalist comparing this woman to Bruce Jenner:
http://thefederalist.com/2015/06/12/if-rachel-dolezal-isnt-black-how-is-caitlyn-jenner-a-woman/
http://thefederalist.com/2015/06/12/if-rachel-dolezal-isnt-black-how-is-caitlyn-jenner-a-woman/
musterion
Well-known member
If push really comes to shove, this will be the new leftist food chain:
1. Sodomites/lesbians/trannies
2. Mexicans
3. women
4. blacks
1. Sodomites/lesbians/trannies: that's where the biggest political clout and concentration of wealth is. Also worth the most mileage re: the continuing reconfiguration of sexual reality, which is key to the complete restructuring of society.
2. Mexicans: the new hope for the future of the Democrat party. Are all of them left-leaning? No, but enough will be.
3. Women: the Left has begun to reign in feminists too late, after allowing them to denigrate men and drive off more women than intended. So women as a whole have started to be written off as a manipulable source of votes.
4. Blacks: they've served Johnson's purpose and are being supplanted by 1 and 2, though in urban areas remain a brainwashed, permanent voting bloc...very low maintenance, just keep feeding them outrage and lies and the plantation will perpetuate itself.
And in the end, all four groups will be reduced to obsolete, eliminated quislings when the Left gains complete power.
1. Sodomites/lesbians/trannies
2. Mexicans
3. women
4. blacks
1. Sodomites/lesbians/trannies: that's where the biggest political clout and concentration of wealth is. Also worth the most mileage re: the continuing reconfiguration of sexual reality, which is key to the complete restructuring of society.
2. Mexicans: the new hope for the future of the Democrat party. Are all of them left-leaning? No, but enough will be.
3. Women: the Left has begun to reign in feminists too late, after allowing them to denigrate men and drive off more women than intended. So women as a whole have started to be written off as a manipulable source of votes.
4. Blacks: they've served Johnson's purpose and are being supplanted by 1 and 2, though in urban areas remain a brainwashed, permanent voting bloc...very low maintenance, just keep feeding them outrage and lies and the plantation will perpetuate itself.
And in the end, all four groups will be reduced to obsolete, eliminated quislings when the Left gains complete power.
Like you claiming you were a Christian?
GFR7
New member
Once again, you show yourself to be astute. Very astute, indeed. :think:
republicanchick
New member
I kind of feel sorry for her, and her parents seem rather mean to be doing this to her as the stakes are so high with her teaching career and with all her NAACP conferences history.
u feel sorry for a liar?
a deceiver?
well, I think that is what is wrong w/ society these days: the sociopaths and liars and... etc.. get more sympathy than those who try to live according to God's laws..
___
GFR7
New member
Well, there's just such a distance between Bruce Jenner being applauded, awarded, and hailed as a hero, and the massive embarassment and disgrace of this woman. Yet both did the same thing (altered their appearance to pretend to be something they were not born as). Her parents outed her; they must have really had it in for her.
We are chosen because we love him. :straight: Deut 7:7, 1 Pe 2:9, Mt 21:43, Ro 7:4
Last edited:
republicanchick
New member
you sound like a lib here
It couldn't possibly be that her parents appreciate TRUTH and honesty?
wow.. we have really become cynical...
hardened...
used to all the lying... don't even see lying as a big deal anymore, apparently
___
She was deceptive and now she is being outed.
Insofar as Bruce Jenner, different situation.
Everyone KNOWS he was born a man and made the decision to have a sex change.
However, my response would be similar to both:
"Your gender at birth was that of a male".
"Your biological parents are white. That makes you biologically white".
Insofar as Bruce Jenner, different situation.
Everyone KNOWS he was born a man and made the decision to have a sex change.
However, my response would be similar to both:
"Your gender at birth was that of a male".
"Your biological parents are white. That makes you biologically white".
So everyone knowing about it, makes it a different situation, than them being who they claim they are inside, on the outside?
Are transgenders who hide it, different too?
I am only referring to the honesty in which the situations were handled.
I think it was deceptive of this woman to pretend she was black.
I do NOT understand why anyone would have a sex change. The wish to do so simply does not compute. That includes Bruce as well.
However, he didn't say "No, I wasn't born a biological man and have had no surgery to change my gender".
We all know Bruce's situation because he didn't try to hide it.
The woman in question would still be lying if she hadn't been outed.
Thats just it though. Is hiding it the real problem? Is the premise not the same, she sees herself as black and he sees himself as a woman. Lots of transgenders hide it.
In this particular case, it is a bigger issue for me because of the dishonesty involved.
As far as I am concerned, it is not okay for a transgender to hide their born biology from anyone they are romantically involved with.
So if bruce just went off and passed himself off as a woman without letting others know, it be as big as issue as this is?
But its ok to hide it from everyone else, isnt that what this woman did?
The larger point for me is that they both want to pass themselves off as something they are not and will never be, no matter how they dress up the outside, and i think they both need mental help, instead of skin deep appearance to others, the issue is way deeper than their skin.
IF he initiated a relationship with a man who was unaware of his gender prior to surgical intervention, yes. The person deserves to know the facts so they can decide if that is a relationship they wish to be in.
Yes, she did. She portrayed herself as black, which she is not. She did not clarify that she was only biologically white.
I am not arguing with the point you are making but rather stating the difference in how they handled their issues.
Had the woman not been outed by someone else, we wouldn't even be discussing this.
Bruce, OTOH, is being discussed for outing himself. Even though you disagree with both of them, only one represented themselves deceptively.
I haven't seen her response, her parents outed her. Do you think it would really make a difference in her pretending to be something she isnt, if she announced it?
