Try to not be so obnoxious.
Try to BE civil.
Try to not be so obnoxious.
Try to BE civil.
It takes five guys to make a burger in Texas??? That explains quite a lot.They made it up to him. He got to go to Five Guys burgers and fries to feel like a real American for a day. :5020:
You right-wingers are becoming desperate. The boy built a clock. End of story. Time to build a bridge and get over it.
Yeah... what's his deal? :idunno:
He's fourteen...and grown men feel the need to take shots at him. Because he...killed someone? No. Broke the law? No, though he was treated like a criminal.Same thing here. One could say he reconstructed or perhaps customized a clock -- an existing one -- but he invented nothing, as the word "built" is being forced to mean. Even if he had Radio Shacked every component from scratch, he still wouldn't have invented anything.
Do I think what he did was essentially neat? Yep, have from the start. But what he did was barely clever, even by middle school standards.
Uh.... TOL has (for nearly 20 years) discussed theology, religion, politics, sports, entertainment, and just about everything else.
Maybe you logged into the wrong forum today?
I am striving mightily to be civil to you.
He's fourteen...and grown men feel the need to take shots at him. Because he...killed someone? No. Broke the law? No, though he was treated like a criminal.
Remarkable.
Take a guess who said that."We're not pointing a finger at the school district or the police department," ________ said. "Under the current climate that exists in this country, you can't really blame them because when they see something like that, they have to react."
I think it's remarkable that you find adults attacking the character and motivations of a fourteen year old boy for doing nothing criminal or, for all we know, wrong in literally any sense of the word, defensible.What's remarkable is you being progressively reduced to emotional appeals.
I don't care if Gandhi was alive and said it. I don't believe in appeals to authority in lieu of argument. Anyone who thinks the police "had" to respond by handcuffing a fourteen year old and arresting him for taking a clock to school has been taken to school by someone else and may need a clock.Take a guess who said that.
What's remarkable is you being progressively reduced to emotional appeals.
I think it's remarkable that you find adults attacking the character and motivations of a fourteen year old boy for doing nothing criminal or, for all we know, wrong in literally any sense of the word, defensible.
It's really not about the boy himself, at least as far as I'm concerned. You seem to not get that or don't want to acknowledge it.I'm not making an appeal to emotion, but an appeal to examine the fundamentally irrational nature of the fixation here and its root in a larger complaint this boy so obviously is the whipping post for.
I refer you again to the local BOE policies. Were they a problem?I think you're talking out of your bias here. There's nothing reasonable about this circus except in the attempts to halt it.
Gandhi was not a Muslim and so would not have said it. But Muslims did. Ignore it anyway, as well as his sister's admitted past. I don't care.I don't care if Gandhi was alive and said it.
Except when it comes to the Word of God, neither do I. So who made one?I don't believe in appeals to authority in lieu of argument.
:think: Cryptic, yet obscure.Anyone who thinks the police "had" to respond by handcuffing a fourteen year old and arresting him for taking a clock to school has been taken to school by someone else and may need a clock.
Then there's no need for most of what's happening here, questioning the boy and his motives and his ethic and his character.It's really not about the boy himself, at least as far as I'm concerned. You seem to not get that or don't want to acknowledge it.
I'd have the same answer that I had for the clock. I wouldn't know what started it and laying it at the feet of this event or assuming because his parents are Muslim that there was an element of inevitability about it would both be shaky speculations at best. Most Muslims live peaceful lives. Most people who have are treated harshly and subject to revilement because they're not a part of the dominant culture in most respects don't turn into terrorists.Hypothetical: if in 10 years time, this forgotten story is resurrected in a report this boy has gone to join whatever iteration of ISIS exists at that time, or has done something violent in the name of Allah. Which option would you pick to explain that?
a. That trajectory for his life was probable from the get-go.
b. The ridiculous Clock Incident of '15 so scarred the poor lad that THAT'S what forced him to go jihadi. If not for that, he'd be the next Bill Nye.
Just curious.
If they lacked enough discretionary power to avoid this then yes. But I haven't seen them.I refer you again to the local BOE policies. Were they a problem?
Which you know wasn't the point. I could as easily have said Lincoln or Churchill.Gandhi was not a Muslim and so would not have said it.
I didn't ignore it. I addressed it directly. And I don't care about his sister because it has no bearing on the point, other than to expand my note about the need here and how people are scrambling to have something to throw at this...remarkable.But Muslims did. Ignore it anyway, as well as his sister's admitted past.
You did, the moment you did the, "See, a Muslim thinks this is reasonable" instead of making a case for it actually being reasonable. The authority is vested in that Muslim as the proper judge of reasonableness. He's no more or less in that position than either of us.Except when it comes to the Word of God, neither do I. So who made one?
Eh, it has an aim, but I'm not aiming it at everyone. The schooled/fooled bit was obvious enough and turning the clock back should have led you to the time and what time it was.:think: Cryptic, yet obscure.
I never confused an opposing party with a jury or a rational rebuttal with emotionalism, though I've found people who repeatedly try to hoist that flag rarely have anything to salute.Do you get this verklempt in court when you sense a jury isn't leaning your way?
You're quite right. He made a clock. End of story.
He didn't "make" anything...He took an alarm clock apart, removed the component parts from the casing and wired them back together in his little pencil box....End of storylain:
He didn't "make" anything...He took an alarm clock apart, removed the component parts from the casing and wired them back together in his little pencil box....End of storylain:
Then there's no need for most of what's happening here, questioning the boy and his motives and his ethic and his character.