God didn't create God. And despite your claim, like Adam he was born without sin.
Jesus was given birth by a virgin....God had no hand in this?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
WRONG - WHAT ARE YOU REALLY TRYING TO DO - SPREAD DOUBT ?
Jesus had to be a Man because he had to be our Example and be Faithful to the END.
Jesus was given birth by a virgin....God had no hand in this?
Jesus had to be a Man because he had to be our Example and be Faithful to the END.
When ADAM AND EVE TOOK THE CHEMICALLY LADDEN APPLE ,
THEY ABSORBED SOME OF SATAN'S SPIRIT .
GOD COULD NOT CHANGE SATAN BUT HE CAN CHANGE LITTLE SATANS TO BECOME SAINTS.
HENCE JESUS MADE LIKE US AND SHOWING US HOW TO OVERCOME THE SATANIC NATURE.
--------------------------------
Romans 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh,
God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin,
condemned sin in the flesh:
Seems I'm not getting through......kind of interesting response though since I just came from the "human brain vs. computer brain" thread. :cyborg:
If searching for a logical explanation entails doubt...then yes, that's exactly what I'm doing.
Of course, but why all the virgin birth nonsense...when otherwise **POOF** ----> a fully viable Jesus would have sufficed?
My view is that if another man was an original creation (instead of descending from Adam), then they would not be blood kin......like he did Adam? Re: Genesis 2:7
My view is that if another man was an original creation (instead of descending from Adam), then they would not be blood kin.
And if not related by blood, then he could not be a kinsman redeemer.
Concerning all that is past **POOF** ---->
It seems to me that it was advantageous that Jesus grow.
And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man. Luke 2:52
It is good to grow into power by growing the necessary responsibility and wisdom to handle such power.
My view is that if another man was an original creation (instead of descending from Adam), then they would not be blood kin.
And if not related by blood, then he could not be a kinsman redeemer.
QUIP IS NOT A SERIOUS POSTER .
NOT GOING TO WASTE MY TIME WITH THIS.
Who is this "they" you speak of and why this important?
you have to ask ? ask "them" -atrol:
He could have.Of course, but why all the virgin birth nonsense...when otherwise **POOF** ----> a fully viable Jesus would have sufficed?
The work of the Cross was relational. Hebrews 4:15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to empathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are--yet he did not sinWho is this "they" you speak of and why this important?