DocJohnson
New member
You're jumping from one unrelated topic to another.
Christian Group Questions Palin's Pro-life Credentials
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
You're jumping from one unrelated topic to another.
DocJohnson
New member
∅2L84U;2196369 said:
You're confusing me with someone who doesn't know the difference. I absolutely do.
What I'm saying is that vilifying, demonizing, and protesting someone because they only agree with you 99% is not going to convince them that they're 1% wrong.
Sozo again
New member
How do you suggest convincing them, so that you can support them and join them in the battle? If THEY do not stand with the truth, THEY stand against it. How can it be otherwise?
DocJohnson
New member
∅2L84U;2196415 said:
By including them in the movement and gradually winning them over 100% using reasoned discussion.
Chasing them in the opposite direction is going to help how exactly?
ProlifeProfiles.com doesn't chase anyone away. It merely states well known political and media personalities actual stance on abortion.
If they choose to see their own stance as a threat maybe they should reconsider their own stance. :idunno:
DocJohnson
New member
Again, I'm directing my anger towards those who actively vilify, demonize, and protest individuals who agree 99% with our cause.
just look at the health care bill
there are many who are for abortion but oppose federal funding for it
we should be willing to work with them to get whatever we can get
Sozo again
New member
Do you think it would be wrong if well known evangelists/pastors/teachers/etc. were exposed for denying an essential of the faith? Don't you think it's important that the millions of people who think someone is pro-life are informed that they are not?
DocJohnson
New member
∅2L84U;2196516 said:
Informing someone is one thing.
Vilifying, demonizing, and protesting is another. :mmph:
∅2L84U;2196516 said:
why don't you start by informing them that the Democratic Party supports federal funding of abortion?
Sozo again
New member
When the truth has been revealed and the person refuses to acknowledge it, what do you suggest be the next step?
∅2L84U;2196553 said:
getting in touch with reality
Sozo again
New member
Do you just randomly hit keys on your keyboard hoping to make sense, or do you just like being a nuisance?
DocJohnson
New member
∅2L84U;2196553 said:
I suppose it's beyond the comprehension of the emotionally attached to simply ask them to move on to the next person?
The answer certainly is not to vilify, demonize, and protest someone who agrees with you 99%. :mmph:
Sozo again
New member
Sozo again
New member
No, I'm trying to make a point. It is not OK to kill 1% of the unborn!
DocJohnson
New member
∅2L84U;2196720 said:
It means you're beating a dead horse. If they don't see the truth, they won't see it even if you're vilifying, demonzing, and protesting them.
∅2L84U;2196720 said:
See above.
This is a war. In war you have to accept allies you may not agree with 100%. Just look at World War II. We allied ourselves with our enemy... the Soviet Union.
Someone who agrees with us 99% is a good enough start, and they will become obsolete once we win the war.
∅2L84U;2196814 said:
Tolerate what, exactly?
DocJohnson
New member
Sozo again
New member
Supporting those who support murder?
I just don't see how you can stand with someone who wants to murder 1% of innocent children.
A little leaven leavens the whole lump.